ObjectivesTo compare the success, survival and costs of selective versus stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) in permanent teeth with deep (>2/3 dentine depth) carious lesions.DesignRandomised controlled, unicentre, clustered two-arm superiority trial.SettingOutpatient clinic of a private university in Cairo, Egypt.ParticipantsOne hundred and fifteen participants (n=132 teeth), aged 18–47 years, from Cairo, Egypt, were enrolled. Premolars/molars with occlusal/occlusal-proximal deep lesions (radiographically >2/3 dentine), sensible pulps, without spontaneous pain, were included.InterventionsPeripheral carious tissue removal to hard dentine was performed. Pulpo-proximally, soft dentine was left. A glass ionomer (GI) restoration was placed. After 3–4 months, teeth were randomly allocated to SE (n=66), with reduction of the GI into a base and no further tissue removal, followed by a composite resin restoration, or SW (n=66), with full removal of the GI, additional excavation until firm dentine pulpo-proximally, followed by a GI-based composite restoration. Mean follow-up was 1 year.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcome was success (absence of endodontic/restorative complications). Secondary outcomes were tooth survival and initial and total treatment costs.ResultsZero/five pulp exposures occurred during SE/SW, and seven/five SE/SW teeth required endodontic therapy. Success after 12 months was 89.4% for SE and 84.9% for SW. The estimated mean time free of complications was 23 and 18 months for SE and SW, respectively, without significant differences between SE and SW (p>0.05/Cox). Initial treatment costs were significantly higher for SW (mean (SD): 507.5 (123.4) Egyptian pounds (EGP)) than SE (mean (SD): 456.6 (98.3) EGP), while total costs showed no significant difference (p>0.05).ConclusionWithin the limitations of this interim analysis, and considering the depth of these lesions (>2/3 dentine), SE and SW showed similar risk of failure and overall costs after 1 year.Trial registration numberPACTR201603001396248.

Background: Bioactive glass (BAG) remineralization is a promising method for dental hard tissue regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of incipient enamel-like lesions with or without preconditioning by air abrasion using polyacrylic acid (PAA)-BAG before application of NovaMin remineralizing agent. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human molars were selected, sectioned mesiodistally obtaining buccal and lingual halves, and embedded in resin molds. Specimens were randomly assigned to four groups ( n = 10) according to the remineralization protocol: G1 (control, artificial saliva), G2 (preconditioning), G3 (NovaMin), and G4 (preconditioning and NovaMin). Enamel windows 4 mm × 4 mm were done on the buccal and lingual surfaces. Specimens were immersed in a daily renewed demineralizing solution to create white spot lesions. Remineralizing agents were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, and specimens were stored in a daily renewed artificial saliva. Microhardness was assessed using Vickers hardness number (VHN) at baseline (positive control), after demineralization (negative control), and after 24-h and 1-month remineralization. Results: The preconditioning/NovaMin group after 1 month showed a statistically significant high VHN, with no statistically significant difference between it and the positive control. This was followed by the NovaMin group after 1 month, while the lowest VHN was found in the demineralized group, with no statistically significant difference between it and the preconditioning group, whether after 24 h or 1 month. Conclusions: Enamel preconditioning with PAA-BAG air abrasion play a major role in enhancement of remineralization when it is accompanied with NovaMin. Furthermore, an extended period of time had helped to attain more benefits from NovaMin remineralization. Clinical Significance: Enamel remineralization with NovaMin after conditioning by bioactive glass air abrasion, provides the patients with a fast and durable treatment of incipient enamel lesions, which would reduce the possibility of future progression of demineralization and caries occurrence.

No abstract

Background Although visual inspection is the preferred route in everyday clinical practise for detecting early caries lesions, novel technologies like light fluorescence-based devices (Vista Proof iX HD smart) have been developed to enhance early caries detection. Material and Methods Occlusal surface of 45 molar and 49 premolar teeth from 34 adult participants who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were examined by two observers using three diagnostic methods. Examination was performed visually using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) followed by Vista Proof. Fissurotomy was applied for histological validation. Intra- and inter-observer agreement were measured for ICDAS-II and light-induced fluorescence camera using Kappa test. The overall diagnostic accuracy parameters, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the (AUC) for caries detection by Vista Poof were evaluated. Results For ICDAS-II and Vista Proof methods, there was almost perfect intra- and inter-observer agreement. Based on ICDAS-II as a reference standard 1, Vista Proof showed a low level of agreement in enamel carious lesion detection with low sensitivity value of 48%, high specificity of 100%, and AUC was 0.112, while a high level of agreement in dentin carious lesion detection with high sensitivity value of 100%, low specificity of 48% and AUC was 0.888. Based on fissurotomy as reference standard 2, Vista Proof showed a high level of agreement in dentin carious lesion detection with high sensitivity value of 95% and 0% specificity and AUC was 0.814. Conclusions Quantitative light-induced fluorescence camera with reference to ICDAS-II is considered as an accurate diagnostic modality for detection of early occlusal caries. Histological findings validate the diagnostic accuracy of the camera in dentin. Key words: Histological validation, Initial caries, ICDAS, Light induced fluorescence, Vista Cam.

Objective The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical study was to compare the clinical performance of thermo-viscous bulk-fill resin composite versus conventional bulk-fill resin composite in proximal compound posterior restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of fifty-four Class II cavities were prepared in forty-seven patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of the bulk-fill used (n=27).Group 1 : thermo-viscous bulk fill (Viscalor,Voco) while Group 2: conventional bulk fill (Xtra-fil ,Voco). Both groups received the same adhesive system; selective enamel etching using the single dosed dual cured universal adhesive (Futura-bond U, Voco). All restorations were clinically evaluated at periods of 1 week (initial recall), after six months, and after one year. Assessment was done according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using Friedman to compare between the tested periods for each group (p < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 regarding all tested criteria at different follow up periods; where P > 0.05. Conclusions: Thermo-Viscous Bulk fill composite (Viscalor bulk fill) and conventional packable bulk fill composite resin (X-tra-fil) exhibited comparable acceptable clinical performance after one year of clinical evaluation.