BackgroundThe successful implementation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines relies heavily on primary care physicians (PCPs) providing risk factor evaluation, intervention and patient education. The aim of this study was to ascertain the degree of awareness and implementation of the Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice (CEIPC guidelines) among PCPs.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of PCPs was conducted in Spain between January and June 2011. A random sample of 1,390 PCPs was obtained and stratified by region. Data were collected by means of a self-administered questionnaire.ResultsMore than half (58%) the physicians were aware of and knew the recommendations, and 62% of those claimed to use them in clinical practice, with general physicians (without any specialist accreditation) being less likely to so than family doctors. Most PCPs (60%) did not assess cardiovascular risk, with the limited time available in the surgery being cited as the greatest barrier by 81%. The main reason to be sceptical about recommendations, reported by 71% of physicians, was that there are too many guidelines. Almost half the doctors cited the lack of training and skills as the greatest barrier to the implementation of lifestyle and behavioural change recommendations.ConclusionsMost PCPs were aware of the Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines on CVD prevention (CEIPC guidelines) and knew their content. However, only one third of PCPs used the guidelines in clinical practice and less than half CVD risk assessment tools.

No abstract

Breastfeeding prevalence in the Community of Madrid did not reach the international recommendations in 2008-2009. It is necessary to intensify strategies for breastfeeding promotion, protection, and support, including their periodic monitoring.

Iodine supplementation in pregnancy and lactation El beneficio de la suplementación con yodo durante la gestación en las áreas con deficiencia grave de yodo está bien establecido. En el año 2004 la Organización Mundial de la Salud incluyó a España entre los países con adecuada ingesta de yodo y varios estudios recientes confirman que la ingesta de yodo es suficiente en la población española. Los profesionales españoles, sin embargo, se han encontrado con recomendaciones contradictorias, lo que ha generado confusión e incertidumbre en la práctica a seguir en cuanto a la suplementación de yodo a la mujer gestante o en periodo de lactancia. A los clínicos e investigadores les preocupa que las situaciones de déficit de yodo leve o moderado puedan relacionarse con un peor desarrollo de los niños, pero la suplementación rutinaria de yodo en la gestación no está exenta de riesgo. PrevInfad considera que, al tratarse de una medida profiláctica que afecta a dos individuos-madre e hijo-y que se aplica al conjunto de una población sana, debe primar el principio de precaución y que no existen pruebas de calidad suficiente para determinar el balance entre los beneficios y los riesgos de la suplementación farmacológica de yodo durante la gestación y la lactancia, por lo que sugiere que no se realice esta intervención. The benefits of Iodine supplementation in Iodine-deficient areas are well established. The World Health Organization included Spain among the countries with an adequate Iodine intake in 2004 and some recent research papers confirm that Iodine intake is adequate in the Spanish population. Nevertheless, Spanish health professionals have been faced with contradictory recommendations, producing confusion and uncertainty in clinical practice referring to Iodine supplementation in pregnancy and breastfeeding mothers. Clinicians and researchers are concerned that mild or moderate Iodine deficiency could be related to underdevelopment in children, but routine Iodine supplementation in pregnancy is not risk free. The working group PrevInfad (Prevention in Childhood and Adolescence) considers that being a preventive intervention that applies to the total healthy population, the precaution principle must be prioritized, and that there is no evidence on the balance risk-benefit in the pharmacological Iodine supplementation during pregnancy and breastfeeding. For these reasons they suggest not making this intervention.

No abstract