This paper departs from a preliminary near-shore measurement test campaign hold at El Pont del Petroli (PdP), Barcelona (Spain) where measurements from a Doppler wind-lidar buoy (the ”floating” lidar) are cross-examined against an on-shore reference lidar. From this framework the methodological analysis to intercompare two such lidars in terms of the retrieved Horizontal Wind Speed (HWS) - as key variable - is presented along with an overview of the signal-processing block diagram. Central to this work is to introduce the main error indicators (e.g., bias, RMSE, determination coefficient, absolute error and scatter plots) used to assess the performance of the floating lidar in the campaign. Finally, it is shown that even a basic smoothing procedure on the retrieved 1-s HWS time series is enough to enhance the determination coefficient against the reference lidar Turbulence Intensity (TI).Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
In recent years, floating lidar systems (FLS) have developed into a fully-fledged and accepted measuring instrument for determining and surveying wind conditions in the offshore sector. FLS are currently primarily used for wind resource assessment purposes before the construction phase of an offshore wind farm. That is why a precise knowledge of the measurement accuracy or uncertainty of the FLS for different wind and wave conditions is very important. The lack of knowledge could be mitigated with a simulation tool for FLS of different types and for variable wind and wave conditions. Within this paper we present an approach for such a simulation framework for FLS and the process for validating this simulation environment using data from an offshore measurement campaign. The data used for the validation include data from one FLS and two reference measurement systems (measuring mast and fixed lidar).
In recent years, floating lidar systems (FLS) have been used in increasing numbers for project planning and design of offshore wind farm projects. To assess the quality of the measured data or the wind resources, an exact knowledge of the measurement uncertainty of the FLS is important. However, this is difficult because there is usually no reference measurement system at the offshore sites where FLSs are to be used to assess wind resources. In order to estimate the quality of the measurements or the measurement uncertainty for a site without a reference measurement system, in this case only measurement uncertainties from measurement campaigns or trial campaigns that have already been carried out can be used. However, the respective wind and wave conditions differ from location to location. In this respect, a direct transfer of the measurement uncertainty from one measurement location to another location is again subject to a certain uncertainty.
In this paper, we explore the possibilities of a different, simulation-based, approach. First, we discuss which parts of the measurement uncertainty of the FLS can be investigated in the context of simulations. Additionally, we present a workflow for the simulation of an FLS for different wind and wave conditions and an approach to determine and compare the simulated bin-averaged deviations for these conditions with real measurement data. Finally, we show a comparison of the simulated uncertainties with measurement uncertainties determined during a six-month measurement campaign of an FLS against an offshore measurement mast and a fixed reference lidar and give an outlook on possible further use cases of this simulation-based methodology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.