In vivo production of thromboxane (TX) A2 and the cysteinyl-containing leukotrienes (LT) C4, D4, and E4 in correlation to airway responses was studied. Bronchial provocation with specific allergen in atopic asthmatics was followed by a significant increase in urinary concentration of immunoreactive LTE4 (34 +/- 6 before versus 56 +/- 7 ng/mmol creatinine after allergen challenge; n = 5) and 11-dehydro-TXB2 (164 +/- 29 versus 238 +/- 25 ng/mmol creatinine). In the presence of the leukotriene-antagonist ICI-204,219, which significantly increased the PD20 for allergen, the increment in urinary excretion of LTE4 was even higher (60 +/- 8 versus 288 +/- 128 ng/mmol creatinine; n = 5). In contrast, provocation with histamine (n = 5) did not provoke release of leukotrienes or thromboxane, nor was inhalation of LTD4 (n = 7) associated with increased urinary concentration of 11-dehydro-TXB2. Furthermore, bronchoconstriction induced by inhalation of lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (n = 4) was followed by increased levels of LTE4 in the urine, whereas the levels of 11-dehydro-TXB2 remained the same. Finally, the basal levels of LTE4 in the urine of nine aspirin-sensitive asthmatics were elevated as compared with 15 other asthmatics (112 +/- 54 versus 38 +/- 20 ng/mmol creatinine; p less than 0.001). The findings support that the cysteinyl-leukotrienes are potential mediators of allergen-induced asthma and that the release of LTE4 and 11-dehydro-TXB2 into the urine appeared to be a direct and dose-dependent effect of the antigen-antibody reaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
From bronchoprovocation studies and investigations of the acute effects of drugs that inhibit leukotrienes (LT), the hypothesis has emerged that leukotrienes are important mediators of airway obstruction and other symptoms in aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA). However, it has yet not been shown if subjects with AIA respond favorably to clinical treatment with leukotriene inhibitors. Therefore, in a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study, we examined the effects of 6 wk of treatment with the leukotriene-pathway inhibitor zileuton (600 mg, four times daily) in 40 patients with well-characterized AIA. The treatment was added to existing therapy, which included medium to high doses of inhaled (average daily dose 1,030 microg of beclomethasone or budesonide) or oral glucocorticosteroids (4 to 25 mg/d) for all but one of the patients. On top of this treated baseline, there were no significant effects of adding placebo, indicating that their asthma was kept relatively stable. However, there was an acute and chronic improvement in pulmonary function after treatment with zileuton, expressed both as increased FEV1 from baseline compared with placebo, and higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) values on zileuton treatment compared with placebo. The improvements occurred despite lower use of rescue bronchodilator with zileuton. Zileuton also diminished nasal dysfunction, which is one of the cardinal signs of AIA. There was a remarkable return of smell, less rhinorrhea, and a trend for less stuffiness and higher nasal inspiratory flow during treatment with zileuton. Zileuton caused a small but distinct reduction of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine and inhibited aspirin-induced bronchoconstriction. Zileuton inhibited urinary excretion of LTE4 but did not change airway reactivity to inhaled LTD4, supporting that zileuton specifically inhibited leukotriene biosynthesis. The findings indicate that leukotrienes are important mediators of persistent airway obstruction and chronic nasal dysfunction in AIA. The study also suggests that addition of a leukotriene pathway inhibitor such as zileuton may bring about greater control of asthma than what is achieved by treatment with medium to high doses of glucocorticosteroids alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.