Molecular dopants are often added to semiconducting polymers to improve electrical conductivity. However, the use of such dopants does not always produce mobile charge carriers. In this work, ultrafast spectroscopy is used to explore the nature of the carriers created following doping of conjugated push–pull polymers with both F4TCNQ (2,3,5,6‐tetrafluoro‐7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane) and FeCl3. It is shown that for one particular push–pull material, the charge carriers created by doping are entirely non‐conductive bipolarons and not single polarons, and that transient absorption spectroscopy following excitation in the infrared can readily distinguish the two types of charge carriers. Based on density functional theory calculations and experiments on multiple push–pull conjugated polymers, it is argued that the size of the donor push units determines the relative stabilities of polarons and bipolarons, with larger donor units stabilizing the bipolarons by providing more area for two charges to co‐reside.

When an electron is removed from a conjugated polymer, such as poly(3‐hexylthiophene‐2,5‐diyl) (P3HT), the remaining hole and associated change in the polymer backbone structure from aromatic to quinoidal are referred to as a polaron. Bipolarons are created by removing the unpaired electron from an already‐oxidized polymer segment. In electrochemically‐doped P3HT films, polarons, and bipolarons are readily observed, but in chemically‐doped P3HT films, bipolarons rarely form. This is explained by studying the effects of counterion position on the formation of polarons, strongly coupled polarons, and bipolarons using both spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction experiments and time‐dependent density functional theory calculations. The counterion positions control whether two polarons spin‐pair to form a bipolaron or whether they strongly couple without spin‐pairing are found. When two counterions lie close to the same polymer segment, bipolarons can form, with an absorption spectrum that is blueshifted from that of a single polaron. Otherwise, polarons at high concentrations do not spin‐pair, but instead J‐couple, leading to a redshifted absorption spectrum. The counterion location needed for bipolaron formation is accompanied by a loss of polymer crystallinity. These results explain the observed formation order of single polarons, coupled single polarons, and singlet bipolarons in electrochemically‐ and chemically‐doped conjugated polymers.

No abstract

No abstract