Background— The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the late outcome of surgical treatment for aortic valve regurgitation due to Takayasu arteritis and correlate it with evidence of inflammation on pathological examination. Methods and Results— Ninety consecutive patients who underwent surgery for aortic valve regurgitation due to Takayasu arteritis between 1979 and 2003 were studied. Intraoperative pathological specimens of the aortic wall from 69 patients were retrospectively examined for inflammation. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 63 patients (group A) and composite graft repair in 27 patients (group B). The aortic root diameter was 39.9±9.5 mm in group A and 54.4±13.6 mm in group B ( P <0.0001). Preoperative steroid therapy was performed in 40 patients (44.4%). Hospital mortality was 4.8% (3/63) in group A and 7.4% (2/27) in group B. The overall 15-year survival rate was 76.1%. Detachment of the valve or graft occurred in 11.1% (7/63) of group A and in 3.7% (1/27) of group B patients ( P =0.43). Late dilatation (>50 mm) of the residual ascending aorta occurred in 11.1% (7/63) of group A and in 3.7% (1/27) of group B patients ( P =0.43). Active inflammation was confirmed in intraoperative pathological specimens of 10 patients, and detachment of the valve or graft occurred in 4 of these patients. Univariate analysis of background variables revealed active inflammation to be a risk factor for detachment ( P =0.0001; risk ratio 55). Conclusions— Late dilatation of the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement is a clinically important finding. Active inflammation could be related to valve or graft detachment.
We investigated the prevalence, risk factors, and optimal timing of treatment for advanced periodontitis in patients undergoing elective heart valve surgery. Dental examinations were given to 209 patients (aged 65 ± 10 years) scheduled for valve surgery. Patients with no or mild periodontitis were assigned as controls (n = 105). Patients with advanced periodontitis underwent tooth extraction and curettage (n = 104), 68 of whom underwent tooth extraction within two weeks (short wait) and 36 of whom underwent extraction longer than two weeks, before surgery. The three groups (control, short, and long wait) were similar in age, gender, diseased valve, and type of surgery received. The average number of teeth extracted was 2.3 ± 2.3. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, risk factors for advanced periodontitis were history of smoking and heart failure. No complications arose from the extractions. Length of postoperative hospital stay, intrafebrile days, white blood cell count and serum C-reactive protein (assessed at postoperative days 1, 3 and 7) were similar among the three groups. During the mean follow-up period of 60 ± 16 months, no patient developed prosthetic valve endocarditis, and there were no postoperative deaths. In conclusion, we found no evidence that receipt and timing of dental treatment affected surgical success rates and postoperative course.
The aim of this study was the evaluation of the thrombogenicity and the biocompatibility of the SunMedical EVAHEART left ventricular assist system (LVAS) coated with 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymer compared to a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating. Four calves were implanted with the MPC polymer-coated LVAS. Eight calves were implanted with DLC coated LVAS. The thrombogenicity and biocompatibility of the pumps were evaluated. At explant, 60.0 +/- 37.2% (5-85%) of the pump surface area was still coated with MPC polymer after the duration of 45.0 +/- 32.0 days. In 1 out of 4 MPC and 2 out of 8 DLC coated pumps, there was a very small amount of thrombus around the seal ring; otherwise the blood contacting surfaces were free of thrombus. Major organs were normal except for a few lesions in kidneys from both groups. The MPC polymer coated EVAHEART LVAS seems to have low thrombogenicity and high biocompatibility similar to the DLC coated system. The current study demonstrated that the MPC polymer coating shows great promise for being used as an antithrombogenic substrate for the LVAS due to its ease of application, significant cost benefit, and reduction in anticoagulation therapy in acute postoperative period.
Anomalous subaortic left brachiocephalic vein (ASLBV) is a rare systemic venous anomaly. We review our experience with patients associated with ASLBV who underwent cardiac surgery at three institutions. From 1989 to 2009, the medical records of surgically treated patients with ASLBV were analyzed; the incidence of ASLBV, clinical characteristics, and associated anatomical findings were assessed. Fifteen patients had ASLBV. All ASLBVs coursed left lateral to the aortic arch, passed under the ascending aorta anterior to the central pulmonary artery, and joined the right brachiocephalic vein. Fourteen patients had congenital heart disease (CHD), and the remaining patient did not have cardiac anomalies. Its incidence was 0.57% (14 of 2,449) in patients with CHD and only 0.02% (1 of 4,805) in patients without CHD. In patients with CHD, 73.3% (11 of 15) of the patients had conotruncal cardiac anomalies such as tetralogy of Fallot, ventricular septal defect with pulmonary atresia, truncus arteriosus, and interruption of the aortic arch. Eight patients had aortic arch anomalies, including right aortic arch and cervical aortic arch. The deletion of chromosomal 22q11.2 was confirmed in two patients, and one patient was diagnosed with DiGeorge syndrome. ASLBV was clinically silent even without any surgical intervention. ASLBV is a very rare anomaly and is highly associated with conotruncal cardiac anomalies and aortic arch anomalies, including right aortic arch and cervical aortic arch. Preoperative diagnosis is important when any surgical interventions are intended, especially, in patients with conotruncal cardiac anomalies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.