We evaluated the therapeutic potential of the replication competent vector VA7-EGFP, which is based on the avirulent Semliki Forest virus (SFV) strain A7 (74) carrying the EGFP marker gene in an orthotopic lung cancer tumor model in nude mice. We have previously shown that this oncolytic vector destroys tumor cells efficiently in vitro and in vivo (in subcutaneous tumor model). Tumor growth in animals with orthotopically implanted adenocarcinoma cells (A549) were monitored during the study with small animal CT. We show that locally administered virotherapy with VA7-EGFP increased survival rate in experimental lung cancer significantly (p < 0.001) comparable to results obtained with the second generation conditionally replicating adenoviral vector Ad5-D24TK-GFP, used for comparison. The limited efficacy in systemically administered oncolytic viruses is the essential problem in oncolytic virotherapy and also in this study we were not able to elicit significant response with systemic administration route. Despite the fact that tumor microenvironment in orthotopic lung cancer is more optimal, viruses failed to home to the tumors and were unable to initiate efficient intratumoral replication. Clearly, the efficacy of virotherapy is influenced by many factors such as the route of virus administration, immunological and physiological barriers and cancer cell-specific features (IFNresponsiveness). ' 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: SFV; CRAd; oncolytic; orthotopic tumor model; NSCLC The most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer death throughout the world is lung cancer. There were an estimated 1.35 million new lung cancer cases and 1.18 million deaths in 2002. 1 Based on differences in biological behavior and clinical course, lung cancer is classified into two main groups: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. The tree major subtypes of NSCLCs are squamous cell carcinoma (epidermoid carcinoma), adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma. These cancer types account for nearly 80 % of all lung cancer cases. 2,3 For lung cancer, radical surgical resection is the only clinically relevant option for long-term survival. Unfortunately, at the time of diagnosis only 20-30% of the patients are eligible for radical resection. [4][5][6] Moreover, the conventional treatment modalities (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) remain mostly palliative (UICC Manual of Clinical Oncology, 2004). The failure to treat lung cancer successfully with conventional treatments highlights the need to develop new and innovative treatment modalities, such as gene therapy and oncolytic virotherapy.Oncolytic virotherapy induces tumor cell destruction through lysis of the malignant cells, caused by vigorous replication of the virus. This promising approach to specifically destroy the tumor tissue via genetically manipulated or natural viruses has been widely tested in experimental settings, 7,8 and a few promising regimens have reached the clinical phase. [9][10][11] Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (family: Togaviridae, genus: al...

The non-viral gene transfer methods have gained more interest in recent years due to their better safety profiles when compared to their viral counterparts. However, the efficiency of non-viral gene transfer is well below those reached by viral vector systems. The type I interferon response induced by non-viral methods may in part contribute to this inefficiency, while most currently used viral gene transfer vectors fail to induce or are able to suppress type I IFN response.

Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is one of the latest candidates for a virotherapeutic agent against cancer, and recent studies have demonstrated its efficacy in tumor models. In the present study, we examined the antitumor efficacy of an avirulent SFV strain A7(74) and its derivative, a replication-competent SFV vector VA7-EGFP, in a partially immunodeficient mouse tumor model (subcutaneous A549 human lung adenocarcinoma in NMRI nu/nu mouse) and in an immunocompetent rat tumor model (intracranial BT4C glioma in BDIX rat). When subcutaneous mouse tumors were injected 3 times with VA7-EGFP, intratumorally treated animals showed almost complete inhibition of tumor growth, while systemically treated mice displayed only delayed tumor growth (intravenous injection) or no response at all (intraperitoneal injection). This was at least partially due to a strong type I interferon (IFN) response in the tumors. The animals did not display any signs of abnormal behavior or encephalitis, even though SFV-positive foci were detected in the brain after the initial blood viremia. Intracranial rat tumors were injected directly with SFV A7(74) virus and monitored with magnetic resonance imaging. Tumor growth was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) with one virus injection, but the tumor size continued to increase after a lag period and none of the treated animals survived. Three virus injections or T-cell suppression with dexamethasone did not significantly improve treatment efficacy. It appeared that the local virotherapy induced extensive production of neutralizing anti-SFV antibodies that most likely contributed to the insufficient treatment efficacy. In conclusion, we show here that SFV A7(74) is a potential oncolytic agent for cancer virotherapy, but major immunological hurdles may need to be overcome before the virus can be clinically tested. ' 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

No abstract

Cancer suicide gene therapy based on herpes simplex virus type I thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) and ganciclovir (GCV) suffers from the lack of efficacy in clinical use, which is mostly due to low gene-transfer efficiency and absence of bystander effect in tumors. We have previously demonstrated the enhancement of GCV cytotoxicity by fusing the HSV-TK with the cell penetrating peptide from HIV-1 transactivator protein transduction domain (TAT PTD). Despite the earlier promising results, we found that the triple fusion protein HIV-1 transactivator protein transduction domain-thymidine kinase suicide gene-green fluorescent protein marker gene (TAT-TK-GFP) increased GCV cytotoxicity only in 3/12 of different human tumor cell lines. Extended GCV exposure enhanced the cytotoxic effect of HSV-TK/GCV gene therapy, but the difference between TK-GFP and TAT-TK-GFP was not statistically significant. The modest improvement on cell killing mediated by TAT PTD in Chinese hamster ovary cells appeared to be associated with cellsurface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) composition. However, TAT-mediated increased cell death did not correlate with the density of cell-surface HSPG expression in different tumor cell lines. In conclusion, although some degree of enhancement by TAT was shown in certain tumor cells in vitro, it is unlikely that TAT peptide linked to a suicide protein could be a useful booster of in vivo gene therapy trials.