The Harvest system resulted in a greater CTP number and concentration after centrifugation when compared with the Biomet and Arteriocyte systems and may thus provide increased osteogenic and chondrogenic capacity.

Background Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Results Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [ P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [ P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [ P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [ P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [ P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Conclusions Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Background: We sought to independently validate published data that volar cortical integrity (VCI) is an independent predictor of maintenance of closed reduction in a series of non-surgically treated distal radius fractures, while simultaneously investigating previously reported predictors of instability. Our null hypothesis was that volar cortical integrity would not affect maintenance of reduction. Methods: Four hundred thirty-three adult distal radius fractures were screened from our Orthopedic database with 112 meeting inclusion criteria. Two groups were determined on the basis of maintenance of reduction (MOR) or loss of reduction (LOR) at 5–6 weeks post-reduction. Bivariate analysis was applied to previously published instability factors along with VCI. A forward stepwise logistic regression was then used to identify instability factors that, as a group, are most predictive of outcome. Results: Results of 112 patients were collected. Reduction was maintained in 62 patients (55.35%) at 5–6 weeks Biivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in volar cortical integrity between the 2 groups (80.6% MOR vs 59.2% LOR). Forward stepwise logistic regression analysis of subgroups revealed that post-reduction radial height and VCI were together statistically significant in the model. The presence of VCI, post-reduction radial height greater than or equal to ulnar neutral at the time of initial reduction resulted in a 67.8% successful MOR. Conclusions: We were able to confirm the importance of volar cortical integrity as a predictor of successful maintenance of reduction in non-surgically managed distal radius fractures. When combined with post-reduction radial height greater than or equal to ulnar neutral at the time of initial reduction, it showed a 67.8% MOR with non-operative management in our data-set.