No abstract

No abstract

The experimental set-up described is reliable for evaluating HMEs and can also be used for future clinical evaluation of HMEs. The main advantages of this set-up over those described previously are: (i) measurements of dynamic variations of water and heat exchange; (ii) on-line measurements of expiratory, as well as inspiratory resistance.

A data acquisition and processing system for the analysis of inert gas wash-out tests is described. The described system is in clinical use on spontaneously breathing patients as well as on mechanically ventilated Intensive Care patients. It combines several analysis techniques with an aim to provide a deeper insight into the nature of existing ventilation inhomogeneity than the individual techniques alone can provide. The signals measured are the respiratory flow, the fractions of one or two indicator gases washing out and the fractions of the metabolic gases oxygen and carbon dioxide. Analysis of these signals provides information concerning the end-expiratory lung-volume, distribution of ventilation and perfusion in the lung, the role of diffusion in the ventilation process and the metabolic oxygen uptake and CO2 release. This article describes the algorithms used and the results that are presented.

There was no improvement in pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters during the DEEF mode in comparison to the IPPV mode. The small increase in EEV during DEEF was probably caused by the slightly higher mean expiratory pressures as in the PEEP mode. However, this had no effect on the hemodynamic parameters. As we could not observe any improvement with the DEEF ventilation in our optimally pretreated postoperative COPD patients, we do not advise applying this therapy in this group of patients, since this mode of ventilation may cause barotrauma if not monitored adequately.