Since the earlier anaerobic treatment systems, the design concepts were improved from classic reactors like septic tanks and anaerobic ponds, to modern high rate reactor configurations like anaerobic filters, UASB, EGSB, fixed film fluidized bed and expanded bed reactors, and others. In this paper, anaerobic reactors are evaluated considering the historical evolution and types of wastewaters. The emphasis is on the potential for application in domestic sewage treatment, particularly in regions with a hot climate. Proper design and operation can result in a high capacity and efficiency of organic matter removal using single anaerobic reactors. Performance comparison of anaerobic treatment systems is presented based mostly on a single but practical parameter, the hydraulic retention time. Combined anaerobic reactor systems as well as combined anaerobic and non-anaerobic systems are also presented.

Polishing ponds are used to improve the quality of effluents from efficient anaerobic sewage treatment plants like UASB reactors, so that the final effluent quality becomes compatible with legal or desired standards. The residual organic material and suspended solids concentrations in the digested sewage are reduced, but often the main objective of polishing ponds is to improve the hygienic quality, measured by the concentration of two indicator organisms: helminth eggs and faecal coliforms (FC). The FC removal is normally the slowest process and for that reason becomes the main design criterion for a polishing pond. By contrast in conventional waste stabilisation pond (WSP) systems the organic material removal is the governing design parameter. The feasibility of operating a single polishing pond for the post-treatment of UASB effluent is shown in this paper and the final effluent quality as a function of the retention time is discussed. Even under the most adverse weather conditions (several weeks of rain) the population of algae remained stable and produced enough oxygen to maintain a predominantly aerobic environment. The final effluent TSS and BOD concentrations were not very low for retention times of less than 1 week, but this could be attributed to the presence of algae in the final effluent. Filtered effluent BOD and TSS concentrations were very low. For retention times of more than 1 week algae were efficiently removed from the liquid phase by the action of predators and algae flocculation and settling, so that a final effluent with a very low BOD and TSS concentrations was produced. To maximise the FC removal efficiency the polishing pond was constructed with the objective of approaching a plug flow regime. However, the observed efficiency was well below the expected value for all retention times, which was attributable to imperfections of the flow regime. From tracer studies it was established that the dispersion number was in the range of 0.14 to 0.16, which means that moderate mixing occurred, even though the pond was designed to avoid mixing as much as possible. Also the dead volume fraction ranging from 0.12 to 0.15 was quite considerable. Due to these imperfections the required retention time for an effluent to be used in unrestricted irrigation was produced for a retention time of about 10 days, twice the value of the minimum retention time for a batch or true plug flow pond. Although the plug flow regime could not be approached in practice, the required retention time of 10 days is still very much shorter than the value used in conventional WSPs (20 to 30 days).

Although septic tanks are amply used for on site sewage treatment, these units have serious drawbacks: the removal efficiency of organic material and suspended solids is low, the units are costly and occupy a large area and operational cost is high due to the need for periodic desludging. In this paper an innovative variant of the UASB reactor is proposed as an alternative for the septic tank. This alternative has several important advantages in comparison with the conventional septic tank: (1) Although the volume of the UASB reactor was about 4 times smaller than the septic tank, its effluent quality was superior, even though small sludge particles were present, (2) desludging of the UASB reactor is unnecessary and even counterproductive, as the sludge mass guarantees proper performance, (3) the UASB reactor is easily transportable (compact and light) and therefore can be produced in series, strongly reducing construction costs and (4) since the concentration of colloids in the UASB effluent is much smaller than in the ST effluent, it is expected that the infiltration of the effluent will be much less problematic.

O presente trabalho relata o desempenho de três sistemas de pós-tratamento de efluente anaeróbio: wetland, leito de brita não vegetado e lagoas de polimento, operados com o objetivo de produzir efluentes para reúso na agricultura do semi-árido do Nordeste do Brasil. Para tanto, foram investigados os parâmetros: DQO, pH, sólidos e suas frações, macronutrientes, ovos de helmintos e indicadores de contaminação fecal. Apenas a Lagoa de Polimento produziu um efluente compatível com as recomendações da OMS para irrigação irrestrita. Os efluentes dos sistemas wetland e leito de brita não vegetado, embora isentos de ovos de helmintos, apresentaram concentração de coliformes termotolerantes acima dessas recomendações. A quantidade de macro e micronutrientes contida nos três efluentes é suficiente para a maioria das culturas cultivadas na região semi-árida do Nordeste do Brasil.

The performance of a pilot scale sewage treatment system composed of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) digester and a sequencing batch activated sludge reactor (SBR) is described. The system constitutes a simple, economic, and compact treatment option and is able to produce consistently a final effluent quality that is equal or better than that of a conventional activated sludge plant. The entire treatment system had a retention time of only 9h and an average operational temperature of 25 degrees C. Due to the efficient anaerobic pre treatment the aerobic sludge production was low and could easily be accommodated for stabilisation in the UASB reactor. The system exhibited excellent operational stability with full nitrification for aerobic sludge ages longer than 9 days. At shorter sludge ages there was excessive wash out of sludge particles and the sludge mass could not be maintained in the SBR reactor. Sludge settleability was good throughout the experimental investigation period of one year. The reduction of the reactor volume and oxygen consumption was more than 50% compared to conventional activated sludge. The anaerobic excess sludge had a high concentration and good stability so that its dewatering and final disposal was a relatively minor problem.