In the case of liver metastases from uveal melanoma, aggressive treatment permitting tumor eradication seems to offer a chance of long-term survival to selected patients. Nevertheless, neither ultrasound screening nor quality of operation had an effect on the outcome of most patients (78%). Better screening tests and more effective multimodality treatments are required to improve survival in uveal melanoma patients with hepatic metastases.

BACKGROUNDThis retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety, efficacy, and long‐term results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cryotherapy as additional means for eradicating liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma when curative treatment was not possible by resection alone.METHODSBetween January 1996 and December 1997, 131 patients with unresectable liver metastases were referred to our department and received chemotherapy. After 3–6 months of chemotherapy, curative surgery of liver metastases was considered possible in 57 patients, either by resection alone in 33 patients (25%) or cryotherapy associated with resection in 24 patients (18%). Characteristics and survival of patients in the cryotherapy plus resection group were compared with those of the 33 patients in the resection group.RESULTSAll patients in the resection group had partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the cryotherapy plus resection group, neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in 13 partial responses, 9 stable diseases, and 2 disease progressions. The rate of postoperative complications in the entire series was 14%. No major difference was seen between the two groups. After a median follow‐up of 48 months, the median survival time was 39 months. The survival rates at 1, 3, and 4 years were similar in both groups: 94, 58, and 37% in the resection group and 92, 50, and 36% in the cryotherapy plus resection group, respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cryotherapy, and liver resection constitutes a promising treatment strategy for patients with extremely advanced metastatic liver involvement. Patients having more than four liver metastases from a colorectal carcinoma or patients with a poor liver reserve due to previous resection should be screened carefully to determine whether they could be candidates for this procedure. Cancer 2002;95:2283–92. © 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10973

Evaluation of tumour size modifications in response to treatment is a critical issue in the management of advanced malignancies. In 1981, the World Health Organization (WHO) established guidelines for tumour response assessment. These WHO1981 criteria were recently simplified in a revised version, named RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), which uses unidimensional instead of bidimensional measurements, a reduced number of measured lesions, withdrawal of the progression criteria based on isolated increase of a single lesion, and different shrinkage threshold for definitions of tumour response and progression. In order to validate these new guidelines, we have compared results obtained with both classifications in a prospective series of 91 patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Data from iterative tomographic measurements were fully recorded and reviewed by an expert panel. The overall response and progression rates according to the WHO1981 criteria were 19% and 58%, respectively. Using RECIST criteria, 16 patients were reclassified in a more favourable subgroup, the overall response rate being 28% and the progression rate 45% (non-weighted kappa concordance test 0.72). When isolated increase of a single measurable lesion is not taken into account for progression with the WHO1981 criteria, only 7 patients were reclassified and the kappa test was satisfying, i.e. > or =0.75, for the whole population as well as for each of the responding and progressive subgroups. Since it provides concordant results with a simplified method, the use of RECIST criteria is recommended for evaluation of treatment efficacy in clinical trials and routine practice.

BACKGROUND The presence of liver metastases represents an independent poor risk prognostic factor for survival in patients with germ cell tumors. METHODS The clinical files of 37 patients who had undergone liver resection for the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors were reviewed to define the indications for resection of residual liver metastases after chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors. The histologic patterns of primary tumor and residual disease were compared. The prognostic factors for survival were studied by univariate analysis. RESULTS All but 2 of 37 patients underwent complete resection. One patient died of postoperative complications. Thirteen complications occurred in 10 patients. Twelve patients had active residual tumor, 7 patients had mature teratoma, and 18 patients had only necrosis on histologic examination. Twenty‐three of 37 patients (62%) were alive with no evidence of disease after a median follow‐up of 66 months (range, 31–134 months). Three prognostic factors were found to be significant in the univariate analysis for unfavorable outcome: the presence of pure embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor, liver metastases measuring > 30 mm in greatest dimension at the time of surgery, and the presence of viable, active residual disease. CONCLUSIONS Because it is impossible to determine the histologic pattern of residual liver masses after chemotherapy with current imaging tools and percutaneous biopsy, patient selection for liver surgery may be undertaken according to the size of residual liver masses. Patients with masses that measure ≤ 10 mm in greatest dimension should be considered for close follow‐up, because they have a high probability of necrosis and are at low risk for malignant disease. Male patients with masses that measure ≥ 30 mm in greatest dimension represent a high‐risk group of patients who are not likely to benefit from liver surgery. Only male patients with masses that measure 10–29 mm in greatest dimension and all female patients with masses that measure > 10 mm in greatest dimension should be considered for liver resection. Cancer 2001;92:578–87. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

No abstract