Our review revealed the absence of strong scientific evidence regarding diagnosis criteria, treatment protocols and follow-up criteria. This implies the use of highly empirical indexes of suspicion in clinical practice. Our review confirmed the existence of a typical but not exclusive population at risk (aged, male, and diabetic patient) and also revealed major issues: lack of primary prevention in population at risk, delays before referral and management, bacteriologic issues caused by antibiotic misuse (agent identification problems, rise of resistant strains), persistence of recurrent cases. A better diffusion of medical information should help improve the management of this severe disease.
The aim of this retrospective study is to review the experience of our institution in performing microvascular head and neck reconstruction between 2000 and 2004. During this period, 213 free flaps, including 146 radial forearm free flaps, 60 fibular flaps and 7 scapular flaps, were performed. Free flap success rate and complications were reported. The pre-treatment factors influencing these results were subsequently analyzed. Functional and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by the same clinician. There were 14 free flap failures, giving an overall free flap success rate of 93.4%. Salvage surgery for recurrent cancer was the only factor correlated with a higher risk of free flap failure (P = 0.0004). The local complication rate was 20.9%. High level of comorbidity (P = 0.009), salvage surgery for recurrent cancer (P = 0.03) and hypopharyngeal surgery (P = 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of local complications. An unrestricted oral diet and an intelligible speech were recovered by respectively 76 and 88% of the patients. Microvascular free flaps represent an essential and reliable technique for head neck reconstruction and allow satisfactory functional results.
The practice audit constantly revealed delayed management of MOE, often resulting in inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. Publication of practice guidelines for primary and secondary care practitioners therefore appears to be essential.
Necrotising external otitis (NEO) is a rare but severe bone infection, usually due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the management of which is not standardised. Systemic antibiotic therapy is usually prescribed for at least 6 weeks, but no review has been published on this topic. We report our experience and have reviewed the literature regarding antibiotic therapy in NEO. Here we describe a case-series of consecutive NEO cases seen over an 8-year period (2004-2011) in a French tertiary-care teaching hospital. Since 2009 we have shortened the duration of antibiotic therapy to 6 weeks. We also present a review of the literature regarding antibiotic therapy in NEO. We include 32 NEO cases, with positive microbiological cultures in 30 cases. Among the 30 patients with suspected or proven P. aeruginosa infections, 27 received an initial combination therapy of ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. The duration of antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced after 2009 (9.4 ± 3.2 weeks versus 5.8 ± 0.7, P < .0.001; and 18.2 ± 8.7 days versus 11.6 ± 6.9, P = .0.03, respectively). Patient outcomes were favorable in all cases, with a 14-month median duration of follow-up. Our literature review (30 case series) shows that initial combination therapy is associated with better outcomes as compared with single therapy (97 % versus 83 %, P < .0.001). We suggest 3 weeks of initial combination therapy (ceftazidime + ciprofloxacin, high doses) followed by 3 weeks single therapy with ciprofloxacin in susceptible P. aeruginosa NEO. A close collaboration between ear, nose and throat and infectious diseases specialists is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.