Ninety-two swine averaging 104 +/- 4.5 kg and 99 cold carcasses averaging 75 +/- 3.1 kg were measured with a four-terminal plethysmograph. Pigs were transported to the abattoir, fasted 4 h, weighted, and measured for body resistance (Rs, omega), body reactance (Xc, omega), and distance (L, cm) between detector terminals that were located along the dorsal axis of the animal. Pigs were slaughtered 12 h later, carcasses were chilled for 24 h, then weighted (whole carcasses and side carcasses), and cold carcass Rs, Xc, and L measurements were obtained. The right side of the carcass was ground twice, and a 1-kg sample was frozen for later analyses of fat, ash, N, and moisture. Fat-free mass (FFM, kg) was calculated from weight and percentage of fat. Regression analyses were used to develop equations for estimating FFM on a live, adjusted live, whole carcass, and half-carcass basis. Live BW, Rs, and L accounted for the majority of the variation in FFM. Adjusting live BW for head, viscera, and blood weight increased the explained variation for live BW and decreased the variation accounted by Rs. Multiple regression models involving Rs, L, Xc, and weight accounted for 82, 84, and 84% of the variation for FFM expressed on a live, adjusted live, and cold carcass basis, respectively. Results from this study indicate that bioelectrical impedance has excellent potential as a rapid, nondestructive method for estimation of FFM for market swine and pork carcasses.

Seventy-two Duroc x Hampshire x Yorkshire pigs were used to evaluate bioelectrical impedance procedures to predict fat-free mass of live pigs. Pigs were allotted by sex, ancestry, and weight. Pigs (12 gilts and 12 barrows) averaging 50+/-2.4 kg were slaughtered to establish a baseline for body composition. A pen of six gilts and a pen of six barrows were randomly selected for slaughter when the pen averaged either 70, 90, 110, or 130 kg. Pigs were weighed, then a four-terminal plethysmograph was used to measure resistance (omega) and reactance (omega), and length (cm) was measured between detector terminals. Pigs were slaughtered 12 h later, and carcasses were chilled for 24 h. The right side was ground twice and mixed and samples were frozen for later analyses of fat content. Actual fat-free mass (ActFFM) was determined from the weights and percentage of fat. Predicted fat-free mass (PredFFM) was calculated using the following equation: Pred FFM = .486 (live weight) - .881 (resistance) + .48 (length) + .86 (reactance) + 7.959. The correlation coefficients between ActFFM and PredFFM ranged from .66 to .91 overall. Correlation coefficients approximating slaughter weight (90 kg) were .94 (P < .02). Fat-free mass was underestimated by the prediction equation at all slaughter weights, but the predicted fat-free mass was highly correlated to the actual fat-free mass, except for the 110-kg gilts (r = .68, P = .15) and the 130-kg barrows (r = .65, P = .16). The data support the use of bioelectrical impedance to measure fat-free mass over a wide range of weights for finishing pigs.

No abstract

and Implications Niche marketing continues to grow in Iowa and the United States as the demand for high quality pork increases for both in home and out of home consumption. The majority of pigs in demand for these markets are Berkshires, with many raised in bedded hoop barns. Berkshires have been shown to have significant advantages in meat eating quality, with significantly poorer feed conversion and higher feed costs. However very little information exists as to how these pigs grow and the nutritional needs to optimize both growth and feed efficiency. Producers have little production data to evaluate and adjust feeding programs. These trials were initiated to help characterize these parameters and allow Berkshire producers a means to be more effective within their production and marketing system. This trial demonstrated that Berkshire pigs grow as fast but consume more feed than expected from traditional commodity genetic lines, resulting in a challenging feed conversion ratio. Barrows grow faster, consumed more feed than gilts, but gilts were more efficient converting feed to gain. Although seasonal feed intakes differ for both sexes, growth rates were similar within gilts and barrows. This information can perhaps be used in designing rations and feed budgeting systems that can lower the feed costs for production of Berkshire pork.

The variation in backfat of commodity pork has declined to the point some major packers are no longer measuring backfat depth. From our previous research with Berkshire pigs, a large amount of variation in backfat and loin eye area (LEA) still existed, especially between barrows and gilts. In our previous research, barrows average one inch backfat depth around 210 pounds whereas gilts did not achieve one inch until 260 pounds. This potentially may be a meat quality issue for gilts marketed less than 260 pounds The objective of these trials was to replicate our previous study and to determine whether these differences persisted within a different set of Berkshire pigs under the same nutritional regimen. Understanding how feed programs and growth rates affect lean and fat deposition rates is a critical aspect to these niche programs in order to maintain consistency and quality of the Berkshire pork products marketed. Overall, barrows averaged an inch of backfat between 230 and 250 lb body weight whereas gilts average backfat was .90 inches at 269 pounds market weight. Only a 30% of the gilts within these two groups were over one inch backfat at market. These differences are crucial when selecting animals for market to achieve the highest desirability in meat quality within the Berkshire marketing system. These differences between barrows and gilts indicate it may be more critical that each are fed differently than in commodity pork production systems.