Bats of the family Vespertilionidae enmit strong ultrasonic pulses for echolocation. If such sounds directly stimulate their ears, the detection of echoes from short distances would be impaired. The responses of lateral lemniscal neurons to emitted sounds were found to be much smaller than those to playback sounds, even when the response of the auditory nerve was the same to both types of sounds. Thus, responses to self-vocalized sounds were attenuated between the cochlear nerve and the inferior colliculus. The mean attenuation was 25 decibels. This neural attenuating mechanism is probably a part of the mechanisms for effective echo detection.

Single-unit responses to tonal stimulation with interaural disparities were recorded in the nuclei of the superior olivary complex (SOC) and the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) of the echolocating bat, Molossus ater. Seventy-six units were recorded from the ICC and 74 from the SOC; of the SOC units, 31 were histologically verified in the medial superior olive (MSO), 10 in the lateral superior olive (LSO), and 33 in unidentified areas of the SOC. Best frequencies (BFs) of the units ranged from 10.3 to 89.6 kHz, and Q10 dB values ranged from 2 to 70 dB. Most ICC neurons responded phasically to stimulus onset and were either inhibitory/excitatory [I/E; (53)] or excitatory/excitatory [E/E; (21)] units. In the MSO, 23 units responded tonically and 7 phasically on, 18 were E/E or E/OF (facilitatory for other input) units, and 11 were I/E neurons. All LSO neurons responded in a "chopper" fashion, and the binaural neurons were E/I units. In E/E units the excitatory response to binaural stimulation was frequently larger than the sum of the monaurally evoked responses. Many neurons with E/I or I/E inputs had very steep binaural impulse-count functions and were sensitive to small interaural intensity differences. Twenty-eight units (24%) responded with a change in firing rate of at least 20% to interaural time differences of +/- 500 microseconds. Within this sample, 11 units (8 from ICC, 2 from MSO, and 1 from SOC) were sensitive to interaural time differences of only +/- 50 microseconds. Of these 11 units, 10 were I/E units responding phasically only to stimulus onset and were also sensitive to intensity differences (delta I), being suppressed completely by the inhibitory input over a delta I range of 20 dB or less. Of 117 units tested in the ICC and SOC nuclei, 86 units (76%) were not sensitive to interaural time disparities within +/- 500 microseconds. Because the BFs of these units sensitive to interaural transient time differences (delta t) ranged between 18 and 90 kHz, responses were elicited by pure tones, and responses did not change periodically with the period equal to that of the stimulus frequency, we conclude that the neurons reacted to interaural differences of stimulus-onset time (transient time difference) but not to phase differences (ongoing time difference). Sensitivity to interaural time differences was also correlated with interaural intensity differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

For echolocation, many species of bats emit frequency-modulated (FM) sounds. When the central gray matter or reticular formation in the midbrain is electrically stimulated, these bats produce FM sounds similar to FM-orientation signals. The auditory system is excited by these emitted sounds, but the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain are attenuated by a neural mechanism operating synchronously with vocalization. This neural attenuating mechanism is present between the auditory nerve and the inferior colliculus and may be a part of mechanisms for effective echo-detection. Among the various orientation sounds emitted by bats, FM sounds are the most suited for echo-ranging. In the lateral lemniscus, the majority of neurons show a very short recovery period, as well as frequent facilitation of their responses to a second tone pulse, so that these neurons are specialized for echo-detection and carry information necessary for echolocation. In the inferior colliculus, single neurons exhibit a broad spectrum of recovery cycles, so that these are probably able to scale echoes from different distances for the distance measurement. Neural-network models of a clock for echo-ranging are discussed. In the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex, there exist neurons specialized for processing FM signals. For the excitation of these FM-specialized neurons, the direction, range, and speed of frequency sweep are important factors. The FM-specialized neurons always have a large inhibitory area and respond to FM sounds sweeping across this area. Although seemingly paradoxical, such properties are easily explained by neural-network models. Orientation sounds of several species of bats consist of constant frequency (CF) and FM components. Neurons specialized for the analysis of CF sounds have inhibitory areas on both sides of a very narrow excitatory area. The responses of the FM-specialized neurons to certain FM sounds in the presence of either FM or CF sounds are discussed in relation to the inhibitory area.

In addition to other sensory modalities, migratory vertebrates are able to use the earths' magnetic field for orientation and navigation. The magnetic cue may also serve as a reference for other orientation mechanisms. In this study, significant evidence is shown that, even in darkness, newts (Notophthalmus viridescens, Salamandridae) spontaneously align according to the natural or to the deviated earth's magnetic field lines, thereby demonstrating a magnetic compass sensitivity. All newts preferred compass directions close to east or west or chose the E/W axially and hence sought to maintain a specific angle or axis relative to the magnetic field vector. Such an active alignment is considered an essential precondition for magnetic orientation. When the horizontal magnetic vector was experimentally compensated, animals became disoriented. We infer that the animals have either learned the preferred magnetic direction/axis individually or that these choices are innate and could even be seasonally different as in migrating birds. It is still an unanswered question as to how and where the physical and physiological mechanisms of magnetic transduction and reception take place. The visual system and other light-dependent (radical pairs) mechanisms alone are often claimed to be in function, but this must now be reconsidered given the results from animals when deprived of light. The results may therefore point to putative receptor mechanisms involving magnetite elements in specialized magneto-receptors.

No abstract