OBJECTIVEThis study compared the efficacy and safety of dual add-on of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin and dapagliflozin added on alone in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis was a double-blind trial in adults with HbA 1c ‡8.0% and £12.0% (64-108 mmol/mol), randomized to saxagliptin (SAXA) (5 mg/day) plus dapagliflozin (DAPA) (10 mg/day; n = 179), or SAXA (5 mg/day) and placebo (n = 176), or DAPA (10 mg/day) and placebo (n = 179) on background metformin extended release (MET) ‡1,500 mg/day. Primary objective compared changes from baseline in HbA 1c with SAXA+DAPA+MET versus SAXA+MET and DAPA+MET. RESULTSPatients had a mean baseline HbA 1c of 8.9% (74 mmol/mol), diabetes duration of 7.6 years, and a BMI of 32 kg/m 2 . At week 24, the adjusted mean change from the baseline HbA 1c was -1.5% (-16.1 mmol/mol) with SAXA+DAPA+MET versus -0.9% (-9.6 mmol/mol) with SAXA+MET (difference 20.59% [-6.4 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001) and -1.2% (-13.1 mmol/mol) with DAPA+MET (difference 20.27% [3.0 mmol/mol], P < 0.02). The proportion of patients achieving HbA 1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) was 41% with SAXA+DAPA+MET versus 18% with SAXA+MET and 22% with DAPA+MET. Urinary and genital infections occurred in £1% of patients receiving SAXA+DAPA+MET. Hypoglycemia was infrequent, with no episodes of major hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONSIn this first report of adding a well-tolerated combination of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin to background metformin therapy in patients poorly controlled with metformin, greater improvements in glycemic control were obtained with triple therapy by the dual addition of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin than dual therapy with the addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin alone.

Venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and T or B cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T/B cell LL) can result not only in life-threatening acute complications but also contribute to significant long-term sequelae. The PREVAPIX-ALL study is an open-label randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of treatment with prophylactic dose apixaban versus no anticoagulation (standard of care) in children and adolescents with ALL and T/B cell LL receiving standard induction chemotherapy with asparaginase and the presence of a central venous access device. On day 29 of induction, all patients undergo screening imaging with duplex ultrasonography and echocardiography. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study is a composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE that includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis or VTE-related death. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding. Secondary outcomes are central line-associated infections, patency and line replacement, superficial thrombosis, arterial events and death. A planned sample size of 500 randomized paediatric patients enrolled over a period of 5 years is based on the estimation of VTE rates of 20 and 10% in the standard of care and apixaban groups, respectively. An optional biomarker study in 150 patients will examine predictors of increased VTE risk and study in vivo anticoagulant effects of apixaban in children by measuring specific biomarkers in the haemostatic system and inflammatory pathway. This study will provide valuable information for the safety and efficacy of apixaban in VTE prevention during induction in paediatric ALL.

Confirmation of efficacy in pediatric drug development has traditionally required large, fully powered efficacy studies that have proven to have major feasibility and ethical challenges. Extrapolation of efficacy in the framework provided by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency is an appropriate solution when there is similarity of disease. When there is uncertainty regarding the degree of disease similarity, partial extrapolation may be utilized. The authors propose a more quantitative approach to partial extrapolation (ie, quantitative extrapolation), involving (1) integration of adult pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and clinical outcome data using pharmacometric models, (2) extrapolation using the adult pharmacometric model to predict PD and efficacy outcomes in pediatric subjects, and (3) validation of pediatric predictions with a streamlined plan of pediatric trials (ie, a quantitative extrapolation plan). A case study is presented for quantitative extrapolation using dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. In this example, the authors demonstrate how adult PK, PD, and HbA1c data can be integrated using a pharmacometric model for DPP-4 inhibitors with pediatric dose selection and efficacy validated with relatively few pediatric subjects.

No abstract