Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vancomycin or daptomycin (VAN/DAP), antistaphylococcal β-lactam (ASBL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and combination therapy of VAN/DAP + ASBL in the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Methods: Databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase database, and google scholar were searched on 1 September 2021. The randomized control trials (RCTs) and comparable clinical studies of VAN/DAP, VAN/DAP + ASBL, ASBL, and TMP-SMX in the management of MRSA were identified. A network meta-analysis was conducted with STATA 14.0.Results: Seven RCTs and two matched cohorts with 1,048 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed that VAN/DAP + ASBL had a significantly lower rate of persistent bacteremia >3 days than VAN/DAP alone [OR:0.46, 95%CI (0.26, 0.81), p < 0.001]. No obvious differences were observed in the outcomes of all-cause mortality, relapsed bacteremia, microbiological treatment failure, embolic or metastatic infection, and total adverse events. However, the ranking results showed that VAN/DAP + ASBL had slightly better efficacy (all-cause mortality, persistent bacteremia >3 days, duration of bacteremia, microbiological treatment failure, and relapsed bacteremia) but slightly higher adverse events than VAN/DAP alone. No obvious differences in the comparisons of VAN/DAP vs. ASBL, and VAN/DAP vs TMP-SMX in the analyzed outcomes. The ranking results revealed that ASBL and TMP-SMX did not have better efficacy or lower adverse events compared with the treatment of VAN/DAP.Conclusion: The efficacy of VAN/DAP + ASBL was slightly but not significantly better than VAN/DAP alone in the management of MRSA.

No abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the survival outcomes of young (<50 years) and elderly patients (>80 years) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) postradical local treatments. Materials and Methods: We identified <50 and >80-year-old patients with high-risk PCa between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients aged 65 and 66 years were also identified as the control group. The propensity-score matching method was adopted to compare the young and elderly patients with the control group. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were conducted to evaluate the PCa-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival. Results: A total of 17726 patients were identified, and 3355 were under 50 years old, whereas 4798 of them were >80 years old. The young patient group (<50 years) had similar PCSS with the control group (65–66 years) in both the overall cohort (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.73–1.06], P = 0.132) and matched cohort (HR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.74–1.24], P = 0.527). Young patients with both high-risk and very high-risk PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) treatment had apparent longer mean cancer-specific survival time than those after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy (BT) treatment (high-risk group: 153.38 ± 0.82 months vs. 149.72 ± 3.03 months; very high-risk group: 148.3 ± 1.84 months vs. 139.33 ± 3.25 months). For the elderly patients (>80 years), the PCSS outcomes were significantly worse than the control group (65–66 years) in both overall cohort (HR: 2.69, 95% CI [2.31–3.13], P < 0.001) and matched cohort (HR: 1.61, 95% CI [1.34–1.94], P < 0.001). Patients receiving RP treatment had similar PCSS outcomes with those receiving EBRT and/or BT in the high-risk PCa group (139.45 ± 9.98 months vs. 139.41 ± 1.84 months), and better PCSS in very high-risk PCa group (132.73 ± 13.56 months vs. 128.82 ± 3.43 months). Conclusion: The PCSS outcomes of young PCa patients (<0 years) were identical to those of the control group (65–66 years). RP had similar or better PCSS benefits than EBRT and/or BT in both young (<50 years) and elderly patients (>80 years).

Male erectile dysfunction (ED) caused by cavernous nerve injury is a common complication of pelvic surgery, radiotherapy, transurethral surgery or other operations. However, clinical treatment for iatrogenic or traumatic male ED is difficult and not satisfactory. Many studies have shown that curcumin can promote the repair and regeneration of peripheral nerves; however, whether curcumin can rescue cavernous nerve injury is unknown, and the poor bioavailability of curcumin limits its application in vivo. Hence, the study was conducted. A curved slow‐release membrane was produced, and the properties were examined. In addition, the effects of the curcumin slow‐release membrane on cavernous nerve‐injured SD rats were studied. We found that polylactic acid‐glycolic acid‐polyethylene glycol (PLGA‐PEG) can be used as a good carrier material for curcumin, and curcumin‐loaded PLGA‐PEG membranes can effectively rescue the cavernous nerve in SD rats, restore the continuity of the cavernous nerve, and increase the expression of nNOS mRNA and proteins in penile tissue, which can improve the penile erectile function of injured SD rats, reduce the degree of penile tissue fibrosis, and effectively promote penis rehabilitation. The curcumin slow‐release membrane is proposed to be a new therapeutic approach for penile rehabilitation of cavernous nerve injury.