No abstract

Background: Cataract surgery in keratoconic patients is challenging because of the corneal distortion, which can lead to inaccurate keratometry readings. This study is a comparison of the accuracy of keratometry readings by two types of devices in a tertiary hospital. Purpose: To evaluate the comparability of corneal power measurements, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and white-to-white (WTW) distance between Scheimpflug-based tomography (Pentacam AXL; OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and swept-source optical biometry (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) in patients with keratoconus. Methods: This pilot, prospective, interinstrument reliability study included 30 keratoconic eyes of 15 individuals who had not undergone any kind of corneal surgery. Standard K and total refractive power (TK®) of the flattest and steepest axes of the IOLMaster 700 were compared with the standard keratometry (SimK), true net power (TNP), equivalent keratometer readings (EKR), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) of the Pentacam. The Bland–Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between the measurements of both devices. The paired-samples t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed to compare the mean values of the variables obtained with the devices. Results: The K1 value of the IOLMaster 700 was significantly higher from EKR K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.79 diopters, p = 0.01), 4-mm (mean difference: 1.01 D, p = 0.01), and 4.5-mm zones (mean difference: 1.20 D, p = 0.01) and TNP K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.88 D, p < 0.001) and 4-mm zones (mean difference: 0.97 D, p < 0.001). The TK1 value was significantly higher from EKR K1 along the 2-mm (mean difference: 0.42 D, p = 0.04), 3-mm (mean difference: 0.83 D, p = 0.003), 4-mm (mean difference: 1.05 D, p = 0.004), and 4.5-mm zones (mean difference: 1.24 D, p = 0.005) and TNP K1 along the 3-mm (mean difference: 0.92 D, p < 0.001) and 4-mm zones (mean difference: 1.01 D, p < 0.001). The K2 value of the IOLMaster 700 was significantly higher from TK2 (mean difference: 0.11 D, p = 0.04) and all the corresponding variables of the Pentacam device. The TK2 value was significantly higher from all the corresponding variables of the Pentacam device. The Pentacam also yielded significantly lower values for the WTW distance (mean difference: 0.31 mm, p < 0.001) and no significant difference in terms of ACD values ( p = 0.9). Conclusion: The IOLMaster measured significantly greater keratometry readings in the steep axis for all the variables studied. The keratometry and WTW measurements of the investigated devices cannot be used interchangeably in keratoconus.

Purpose To assess the agreement among four types of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements: IOP obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOP-GAT),IOP obtained by an air-puff tonometer (Nidek NT-510)(IOP-NCT), the non-corrected IOP obtained by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (IOP-Corvis) and the biomechanically corrected IOP obtained by the Corvis ST (bIOP-Corvis) in healthy patients with a broad spectrum of IOP values. Methods: This prospective, observational study recruited 113 healthy individuals. Each patient underwent IOP evaluation via GAT, Nidek NT-510 and Corvis ST. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The difference between the four IOP measurements was correlated against corneal (CCT) and age with Pearson’s correlation test. Results: IOP-Corvis showed the highest values (16.59  ±  3.08 mmHg),followed by IOP-NCT (16.05  ±  3.43 mmHg), IOP-GAT (15.62 ± 3.08 mmHg) and bIOP-Corvis (15.10 ± 2.67 mmHg).There were statistically significant differences in IOP measurements among all the ANOVA pairwise comparisons except between IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis ( p = 0.07),as well as between IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT ( p = 0.25). Bland Altman analysis revealed a notable bias (all p < 0.05) among IOP-GAT and bIOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-Corvis, IOP-GAT and IOP-NCT, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis, bIOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT,IOP-Corvis and IOP-NCT of 0.51, −0.97, −0.43, −1.49, −0.95, 0.53 mmHg respectively. We observed a strong correlation of the difference between bIOP-Corvis and IOP-Corvis with CCT and patient age. Conclusion: Compared with GAT and Nidek NT-510, the Corvis-derived IOPs were recorded either the highest as IOP-Corvis or the lowest as bIOP-Corvis. Even if the differences among the tonometers were relatively small, the IOP values obtained with the Corvis ST, NCT and GAT were not interchangeable.

Biomaterials calcify upon implantation in contact with biological fluids, which are supersaturated with respect to more than one crystalline phase of calcium phosphate. The implantation of intraocular lenses (IOLs) for cataract treatment has been hailed as a major advance. Hydrophilic acrylic IOLs, made of Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA), upon contact with aqueous humor, exhibit significant incidence of opacification, due to the formation of calcium phosphate crystals, mainly hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH, HAP) on the surface or in their interior. The aqueous humor is supersaturated with respect to HAP. Clinical findings were duplicated by laboratory experiments through the development of appropriate experimental models which included batch reactors, well stirred operating at constant supersaturation (CCR) and reactors simulating anterior eye chamber (ECSR). In both CCR and ECSR, simulated aqueous humor was used. In ECSR the flow rate was the same as in the eye chamber (2.5 mL per 24 h). HAP formed both on the surface and inside the IOLs tested. Induction times preceding the crystallization of HAP on the surface of the IOLs and crystal growth rates were measured. Surface hydroxyl ionized groups favored the development of locally high supersaturation by surface complexation. In the interior of the IOLs, HAP formed by the diffusion of the calcium and phosphate ions inside the polymeric matrix.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®; Allergan, Inc., CA, USA) has been proved to be effective in a variety of clinical settings including cases of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Uncommonly, this implant can migrate from the vitreous cavity and into the anterior chamber, especially in vitrectomized eyes with lens capsule defects. We report herein a rare case of anterior chamber migration and illustrate the passageway of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant through a new type of scleral fixated lens, the Carlevale IOL (Soleko-Italy). A 78-year-old woman was left aphakic following a complicated right eye hypermature cataract surgery with posterior capsule rupture and zonular dehiscence. Shortly thereafter, she underwent a planned combined pars plana vitrectomy with the placement of a Carlevale sutureless scleral fixated intraocular lens for the treatment of her aphakia. Due to a subsequent persistent cystoid macular edema that was unresponsive to topical treatment and sub-tenon corticosteroids, an intravitreal dexamethasone implant was injected. Eleven days after implantation, the patient presented with a floating implant in the anterior chamber and corneal edema. Following an immediate surgical removal, corneal edema resolved and visual acuity improved. One year later, results remain stable without macular edema recurrence. Anterior chamber migration of the Ozurdex implant is a potential complication in vitrectomized eyes, even when new types which are larger and specially designed for scleral fixation intraocular lenses are utilized. Corneal complications can be reversible following an immediate removal of the implant.