Background: Timing of frontofacial surgery for the syndromic craniosynostosis as it relates to various surgical risks has not been adequately studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate posterior dental complications of midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis undergoing surgery at different ages and the effects on subsequent orthognathic surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated with midface advancement (monobloc or Le Fort III) from 1999 to 2018 was carried out. Patient demographics, records, and imaging studies were reviewed. A subanalysis of those patients who were also treated with orthognathic surgery from 2014 to 2018 with imaging studies available for analysis was also performed. Results: Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four percent of the patients had radiographic evidence of maxillary molar dental abnormality. Older age at the time of surgery was significantly associated with a lower odds of sustaining dental injury (OR, 0.55; p = 0.034). The odds of damaging second or third maxillary molars was significantly higher with a younger age at the time of surgery (p = 0.021 and p = 0.034). The odds of sustaining dental injury increased moving posteriorly, showing the risk of abnormal pattern of M3 greater than M2 greater than M1. Advanced age at the time of surgery was significantly associated with decreased odds of dental injury (OR, 0.55; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Damage to the developing permanent maxillary molars may affect orthodontic management, mastication, and potentially maxillary development. Delaying frontofacial surgery until development of the permanent maxillary dentition should be considered if other indications do not mandate earlier intervention.

Background: Computer-aided surgical planning has become popular for planning orthognathic surgery (OS) as it saves surgeons’ time and effort. A recent advancement has been the utilization of patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis. The purpose of this study is to report the postoperative bimaxillary position utilizing custom plates for both jaws versus custom plates used in the maxilla only in 23 consecutive patients. Methods: All patients who underwent bimaxillary OS in 2017–2018 with preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, postoperative day 1 CT scan, and at least 6 months follow-up were included in the study. Group 1 utilized maxillary preprinted plates (maxilla only). Group 2 utilized bimaxillary preprinted plates (maxillomandibular). Eight cephalometric landmarks to evaluate the movements were chosen. The ranges of the angle between the sella/nasion plane and the nasion/A plane (SNA), the angle between the sella/nasion plane and the nasion/B plane (SNB), and the angle created by the A point‚ nasion‚ and B point‚ which measures the relative position of maxilla to mandible, were analyzed to assess the angular change. Mean-squared displacement and the SD of the distances were used to assess movement in space. Results: Twenty-three patients (nine in group 1 and 14 in group 2) met the inclusion criteria. Results showed interarch relationships using custom plates for both jaws with ANB 0.4 compared to ANB 1.4 for maxillary custom plates only. Mandibular landmarks showed greater variation, and the t test study revealed the right mandibular first molar landmark showing the greatest variation (P = 0.03). Conclusions: Custom osteosynthesis plates for OS show good accuracy for the maxilla and higher variation in the mandible. Further studies will determine the margin of error that cannot be corrected with postoperative orthodontics.

Background: Evidence-based medicine uses the current best evidence for decisions about patient care. Lymphedema is a chronic debilitating medical condition caused by a dysfunctional lymphatic system. This study analyzes the most cited articles, including the levels of evidence, for the surgical treatment of lymphedema. Methods: The Web of Science Sci-Expanded Index was utilized to search for surgical treatment of lymphedema. Articles were examined by three independent reviewers and the top 100 articles were determined. The corresponding author, citation count, publication year, topic, study design, level of evidence, journal, country, and institution were analyzed. Results: Since 1970, the top 100 articles have been cited 7,300 times. The average citation count was 68 and standard deviation was 55. The majority were case series (71), followed by retrospective cohort (8), prospective cohort (7), retrospective case-control (5), and randomized controlled trials (2). Based on the “Level of Evidence Pyramid”, 71 articles were level IV, 13 articles were level III, and 9 articles were level II. On the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Scale, there were 71 articles with “very low,” 20 articles with “low,” and 2 articles with “moderate” quality of evidence. Conclusion: The top 100 cited articles were mostly case series and lacked high levels of evidence. Most studies are retrospective case series with short-term outcomes. However, low level evidence for new surgical procedures is to be expected. Current trends suggest the treatment and understanding of lymphedema will continue to improve.