Diabetes and obesity are two metabolic diseases characterized by insulin resistance and a low-grade inflammation. Seeking an inflammatory factor causative of the onset of insulin resistance, obesity, and diabetes, we have identified bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as a triggering factor. We found that normal endotoxemia increased or decreased during the fed or fasted state, respectively, on a nutritional basis and that a 4-week high-fat diet chronically increased plasma LPS concentration two to three times, a threshold that we have defined as metabolic endotoxemia. Importantly, a high-fat diet increased the proportion of an LPScontaining microbiota in the gut. When metabolic endotoxemia was induced for 4 weeks in mice through continuous subcutaneous infusion of LPS, fasted glycemia and insulinemia and whole-body, liver, and adipose tissue weight gain were increased to a similar extent as in highfat-fed mice. In addition, adipose tissue F4/80-positive cells and markers of inflammation, and liver triglyceride content, were increased. Furthermore, liver, but not wholebody, insulin resistance was detected in LPS-infused mice. CD14 mutant mice resisted most of the LPS and high-fat diet-induced features of metabolic diseases. This new finding demonstrates that metabolic endotoxemia dysregulates the inflammatory tone and triggers body weight gain and diabetes. We conclude that the LPS/CD14 system sets the tone of insulin sensitivity and the onset of diabetes and obesity. Lowering plasma LPS concentration could be a potent strategy for the control of metabolic diseases. Diabetes 56: [1761][1762][1763][1764][1765][1766][1767][1768][1769][1770][1771][1772] 2007 T he outbreak of a fat-enriched diet in Western countries is becoming a problem of the utmost importance. Obesity is the result of a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Among the latter, changes in eating habits to increase fat intake are involved in the increased occurrence of metabolic diseases, such as obesity and diabetes, which are bearing features of the metabolic syndrome. The major metabolic consequence of a high-fat diet is that insulin action and the regulatory mechanisms of body weight are impaired through a well-described lipotoxic effect (1). In addition, it has been recently determined that obesity and insulin resistance are associated with lowgrade chronic systemic inflammation (2). In models of diet-induced and genetic obesity, the adipose tissue presents increased expression and content of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-␣ (3,4), interleukin (IL)-1 (3,4), and IL-6 (4). This cytokine production is then deleterious for muscle insulin action; for example, TNF-␣ has been shown to cause insulin resistance by increasing serine phosphorylation on insulin receptor substrate-1 (5), leading to its inactivation. The consequent insulin resistance will favor hyperinsulinemia and excessive hepatic and adipose tissue lipid storage. However, while extensive research is dedicated to the effects of an in...

OBJECTIVE-Diabetes and obesity are characterized by a low-grade inflammation whose molecular origin is unknown. We previously determined, first, that metabolic endotoxemia controls the inflammatory tone, body weight gain, and diabetes, and second, that high-fat feeding modulates gut microbiota and the plasma concentration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), i.e., metabolic endotoxemia. Therefore, it remained to demonstrate whether changes in gut microbiota control the occurrence of metabolic diseases. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We changed gut microbiota by means of antibiotic treatment to demonstrate, first, that changes in gut microbiota could be responsible for the control of metabolic endotoxemia, the low-grade inflammation, obesity, and type 2 diabetes and, second, to provide some mechanisms responsible for such effect.RESULTS-We found that changes of gut microbiota induced by an antibiotic treatment reduced metabolic endotoxemia and the cecal content of LPS in both high-fat-fed and ob/ob mice. This effect was correlated with reduced glucose intolerance, body weight gain, fat mass development, lower inflammation, oxidative stress, and macrophage infiltration marker mRNA expression in visceral adipose tissue. Importantly, high-fat feeding strongly increased intestinal permeability and reduced the expression of genes coding for proteins of the tight junctions. Furthermore, the absence of CD14 in ob/ob CD14 Ϫ/Ϫ mutant mice mimicked the metabolic and inflammatory effects of antibiotics.CONCLUSIONS-This new finding demonstrates that changes in gut microbiota controls metabolic endotoxemia, inflammation, and associated disorders by a mechanism that could increase intestinal permeability. It would thus be useful to develop strategies for changing gut microbiota to control, intestinal permeability, metabolic endotoxemia, and associated disorders.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes are characterized by altered gut microbiota, inflammation, and gut barrier disruption. Microbial composition and the mechanisms of interaction with the host that affect gut barrier function during obesity and type 2 diabetes have not been elucidated. We recently isolated Akkermansia muciniphila, which is a mucin-degrading bacterium that resides in the mucus layer. The presence of this bacterium inversely correlates with body weight in rodents and humans. However, the precise physiological roles played by this bacterium during obesity and metabolic disorders are unknown. This study demonstrated that the abundance of A. muciniphila decreased in obese and type 2 diabetic mice. We also observed that prebiotic feeding normalized A. muciniphila abundance, which correlated with an improved metabolic profile. In addition, we demonstrated that A. muciniphila treatment reversed high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders, including fat-mass gain, metabolic endotoxemia, adipose tissue inflammation, and insulin resistance. A. muciniphila administration increased the intestinal levels of endocannabinoids that control inflammation, the gut barrier, and gut peptide secretion. Finally, we demonstrated that all these effects required viable A. muciniphila because treatment with heat-killed cells did not improve the metabolic profile or the mucus layer thickness. In summary, this study provides substantial insight into the intricate mechanisms of bacterial (i.e., A. muciniphila) regulation of the cross-talk between the host and gut microbiota. These results also provide a rationale for the development of a treatment that uses this human mucus colonizer for the prevention or treatment of obesity and its associated metabolic disorders.RegIIIγ | LPS | gut permeability | Lactobacillus plantarum | antimicrobial peptides G ut microbiota were once characterized as bystanders in the intestinal tract, but their active role in intestinal physiology is now widely investigated. In particular, the mutualism that exists between gut microbiota and the host has received much attention. Obesity and type 2 diabetes are characterized by altered gut microbiota (1), inflammation (2), and gut barrier disruption (3-5). We recently demonstrated an association of obesity and type 2 diabetes with increased gut permeability, which induced metabolic endotoxemia and metabolic inflammation (3-5). Unequivocal evidence demonstrates that gut microbiota influence whole-body metabolism (1, 6) by affecting the energy balance (6), gut permeability (4, 5), serum lipopolysaccharides [i.e., metabolic endotoxemia (7)], and metabolic inflammation (3-5, 7) that are associated with obesity and associated disorders. However, the microbial composition and the exact mechanisms of interaction between these two partners that affect host-gut barrier function and metabolism remain unclear.The intestinal epithelium is the interface for the interaction between gut microbiota and host tissues (8). This barrier is enhanced by the presence of a mucus layer an...

In December 2016, a panel of experts in microbiology, nutrition and clinical research was convened by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics to review the definition and scope of prebiotics. Consistent with the original embodiment of prebiotics, but aware of the latest scientific and clinical developments, the panel updated the definition of a prebiotic: a substrate that is selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit. This definition expands the concept of prebiotics to possibly include non-carbohydrate substances, applications to body sites other than the gastrointestinal tract, and diverse categories other than food. The requirement for selective microbiota-mediated mechanisms was retained. Beneficial health effects must be documented for a substance to be considered a prebiotic. The consensus definition applies also to prebiotics for use by animals, in which microbiota-focused strategies to maintain health and prevent disease is as relevant as for humans. Ultimately, the goal of this Consensus Statement is to engender appropriate use of the term 'prebiotic' by relevant stakeholders so that consistency and clarity can be achieved in research reports, product marketing and regulatory oversight of the category. To this end, we have reviewed several aspects of prebiotic science including its development, health benefits and legislation