A patient walks into the physician's office and presents with a unique set of symptoms. To the physician, this is an unknown illness—the symptom presentation is unusual, like nothing he has ever seen before. Despite a thorough search, there is no information about it in the medical journals, and he hadn't heard about anything like it in medical school. He consults with colleagues and finds they haven't seen this either. He wonders, ‘What is going on here?’ He realizes he is in uncharted territory and attempts to fit the patient's symptomatology into his existing knowledge, finally determining that it is close to Disorder X, but not completely. In the absence of information about the specific situation, the physician uses his current knowledge and framework to explain the situation as best he can. Does this situation sound unusual? Is this something one might expect? When it comes to gifted children, this situation is often more the norm than the exception. Gifted children come with a set of characteristics that are often unknown to a typical medical or mental health professional because professionals receive little, if any, training about the characteristics, social/emotional development, or special needs of gifted individuals. When a gifted child presents to a professional who has no knowledge of gifted children, it is likely that the professional will fit the presenting behaviors or ‘symptoms’ into a framework with which he is familiar, perhaps saying that it looks like this disorder or that disorder, but has an unusual presentation that does not fit any diagnostic criteria completely. He may use the Not Otherwise Specified label for the condition, and it is unlikely that the professional will use giftedness as a frame to explain the behavior, due to lack of experience or knowledge about giftedness. This paper explores and explains much of the inadvertent misdiagnosis of gifted individuals.
the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.