The teaching of anatomy has consistently been the subject of societal controversy, especially in the context of employing cadaveric materials in professional medical and allied health professional training. The reduction in dissection-based teaching in medical and allied health professional training programs has been in part due to the financial considerations involved in maintaining bequest programs, accessing human cadavers and concerns with health and safety considerations for students and staff exposed to formalin-containing embalming fluids. This report details how additive manufacturing or three-dimensional (3D) printing allows the creation of reproductions of prosected human cadaver and other anatomical specimens that obviates many of the above issues. These 3D prints are high resolution, accurate color reproductions of prosections based on data acquired by surface scanning or CT imaging. The application of 3D printing to produce models of negative spaces, contrast CT radiographic data using segmentation software is illustrated. The accuracy of printed specimens is compared with original specimens. This alternative approach to producing anatomically accurate reproductions offers many advantages over plastination as it allows rapid production of multiple copies of any dissected specimen, at any size scale and should be suitable for any teaching facility in any country, thereby avoiding some of the cultural and ethical issues associated with cadaver specimens either in an embalmed or plastinated form.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology capable of readily producing accurate anatomical models, however, evidence for the use of 3D prints in medical education remains limited. A study was performed to assess their effectiveness against cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. A double blind randomized controlled trial was undertaken on undergraduate medical students without prior formal cardiac anatomy teaching. Following a pre-test examining baseline external cardiac anatomy knowledge, participants were randomly assigned to three groups who underwent self-directed learning sessions using either cadaveric materials, 3D prints, or a combination of cadaveric materials/3D prints (combined materials). Participants were then subjected to a post-test written by a third party. Fifty-two participants completed the trial; 18 using cadaveric materials, 16 using 3D models, and 18 using combined materials. Age and time since completion of high school were equally distributed between groups. Pre-test scores were not significantly different (P = 0.231), however, post-test scores were significantly higher for 3D prints group compared to the cadaveric materials or combined materials groups (mean of 60.83% vs. 44.81% and 44.62%, P = 0.010, adjusted P = 0.012). A significant improvement in test scores was detected for the 3D prints group (P = 0.003) but not for the other two groups. The finding of this pilot study suggests that use of 3D prints do not disadvantage students relative to cadaveric materials; maximally, results suggest that 3D may confer certain benefits to anatomy learning and supports their use and ongoing evaluation as supplements to cadaver-based curriculums. Anat Sci Educ 9: 213-221. © 2015 American Association of Anatomists.
Modern imaging techniques are an essential component of preoperative planning in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, conventional modalities, including three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions, are limited by their representation on 2D workstations. 3D printing, also known as rapid prototyping or additive manufacturing, was once the province of industry to fabricate models from a computer-aided design (CAD) in a layer-by-layer manner. The early adopters in clinical practice have embraced the medical imaging-guided 3D-printed biomodels for their ability to provide tactile feedback and a superior appreciation of visuospatial relationship between anatomical structures. With increasing accessibility, investigators are able to convert standard imaging data into a CAD file using various 3D reconstruction softwares and ultimately fabricate 3D models using 3D printing techniques, such as stereolithography, multijet modeling, selective laser sintering, binder jet technique, and fused deposition modeling. However, many clinicians have questioned whether the cost-to-benefit ratio justifies its ongoing use. The cost and size of 3D printers have rapidly decreased over the past decade in parallel with the expiration of key 3D printing patents. Significant improvements in clinical imaging and user-friendly 3D software have permitted computer-aided 3D modeling of anatomical structures and implants without outsourcing in many cases. These developments offer immense potential for the application of 3D printing at the bedside for a variety of clinical applications. In this review, existing uses of 3D printing in plastic surgery practice spanning the spectrum from templates for facial transplantation surgery through to the formation of bespoke craniofacial implants to optimize post-operative esthetics are described. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of 3D printing to become an essential office-based tool in plastic surgery to assist in preoperative planning, developing intraoperative guidance tools, teaching patients and surgical trainees, and producing patient-specific prosthetics in everyday surgical practice.
Membrane nanotubes are a recently discovered form of cellular protrusion between two or more cells whose functions include cell communication, environmental sampling, and protein transfer. Although clearly demonstrated in vitro, evidence of the existence of membrane nanotubes in mammalian tissues in vivo has until now been lacking. Confocal microscopy of whole-mount corneas from wild-type, enhanced GFP chimeric mice, and Cx3cr1gfp transgenic mice revealed long (>300 μm) and fine (<0.8 μm diameter) membrane nanotube-like structures on bone marrow-derived MHC class II+ cells in the corneal stroma, some of which formed distinct intercellular bridges between these putative dendritic cells. The frequency of these nanotubes was significantly increased in corneas subjected to trauma and LPS, which suggests that nanotubes have an important role in vivo in cell-cell communication between widely spaced dendritic cells during inflammation. Identification of these novel cellular processes in the mammalian cornea provides the first evidence of membrane nanotubes in vivo.
Conventional immunohistochemical analysis of airway intraepithelial class II major histocompatibility complex (Ia) expression demonstrates a morphologically heterogeneous pattern of staining, suggestive of the presence of a mixed population of endogenous antigen presenting cells . Employing a novel tissue sectioning technique in conjunction with optimal surface antigen fixation, we now demonstrate that virtually all intraepithelial la staining throughout the respiratory tree in the normal rat, can be accounted for by a network of cells with classical dendritic cell (DC) morphology. The density of DC varies from 600-800 per mm2 epithelial surface in the large airways, to 75 per mm2 in the epithelium of the small airways of the peripheral lung. All the airway DC costain for CD4, with low-moderate expression of a variety of other leukocyte surface markers . Both chronic (eosinophilic) inflammation and acute (neutrophilic) inflammation, caused respectively by inhalation of chemical irritants in dust or aerosolised bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), are shown to be accompanied by increased intraepithelial DC density in the large airways (in the order of 50%) and up to threefold increased expression of activation markers, including the (i chain of CD11/18 . The kinetics of the changes in the DC network in response to LPS mirrored those of the transient neutrophil influx, suggesting that airway intraepithelial DC constitute a dynamic population which is rapidly upregulated in response to local inflammation . These findings have important theoretical implications for research on T cell activation in the context of allergic and infectious diseases in the respiratory tract.T he maintenance of homeostasis in the lung requires precise control oflocal interactions between inhaled antigens impinging on epithelial surfaces in the airways, and the underlying cells of the respiratory mucosal immune system . In particular, an efficient mechanism is required for discrimination between pathogenic antigens such as those present on bacteria and viruses, and inert nonpathogenic antigens (pollens, animal danders, etc.) which are ubiquitous in the natural environment . The failure on the part of the T cell system to maintain this distinction appears to underly a variety of immunoinflammatory diseases in the respiratory tract (1, 2). A key element of local immune regulation in the lung is thus the nature of the cell population(s) responsible for the initial presentation of inhaled antigens to T cells. Recent studies from a number of laboratories have focused attention on the potential role of dendritic cells (DC)t analogous to those ini-1 Abbreviations used in this paper: SALT, bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue ; DC, dentritic cell ; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; RT, room temperature; SHAM, sheep anti-mouse. tially described by Steinman et al. (3), in antigen recognition in the lung. DC which exhibit strong antigen-presenting activity in vitro have been extracted from enzymatic digests ofparenchymal lung tissue (4-8) and from the trach...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.