There is an urgent need for interventions that improve healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients with diabetes‐related foot wounds. In this randomised, open‐label trial, participants were randomised to receive an application of non‐cultured autologous skin cells (“spray‐on” skin; ReCell) or standard care interventions for large (>6 cm2), adequately vascularised wounds. The primary outcome was complete healing at 6 months, determined by assessors blinded to the intervention. Forty‐nine eligible foot wounds in 45 participants were randomised. An evaluable primary outcome was available for all wounds. The median (interquartile range) wound area at baseline was 11.4 (8.8‐17.6) cm2. A total of 32 (65.3%) index wounds were completely healed at 6 months, including 16 of 24 (66.7%) in the spray‐on skin group and 16 of 25 (64.0%) in the standard care group (unadjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.13 (0.35‐3.65), P = .845). Lower body mass index (P = .002) and non‐plantar wounds (P = .009) were the only patient‐ or wound‐related factors associated with complete healing at 6 months. Spray‐on skin resulted in high rates of complete healing at 6 months in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds, but was not significantly better than standard care (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000511235).

Further research with robust methodology is recommended to assess the potential benefit suggested in this review.

No abstract

Small burns are common and can cause disproportionate levels of disability. The ability to measure muscle impairment and consequent functional disability is a necessity during rehabilitation of patients. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of grip and muscle strength dynamometry in patients with unhealed, minor burn wounds. Grip and muscle strength were assessed three times on each side. Assessment occurred at presentation for the initial injury and again every other day (or every 5 days beyond 10 days post injury) until discharge from the service. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation. Minimum detectable differences were calculated for each muscle group. Validity was assessed using regression analysis, incorporating appropriate burn severity measures and patient demographics. Thirty patients with TBSA ≤15% were assessed. Both grip and muscle strength demonstrated very good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85-0.96). Minimum detectable differences ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 kg. Validity of both forms of dynamometry was confirmed through associations with gender for all muscle groups (P < .001). In addition, grip strength was associated with the dominant hand (P = .002) and time to assessment (P < .001). Strength was seen to improve over time in all muscle groups. Grip and muscle strength dynamometry are reliable and valid assessments of strength and are applicable for clinical use in patients who have unhealed, minor burn wounds.