ObjectiveDry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease involving the tears and ocular surface. It impacts a patient’s quality of life (QoL) and ability to perform daily activities. This study assessed the burden of self-reported DED among adults in eight European countries.DesignOnline cross-sectional survey.SettingGeneral population in France, Italy, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.ParticipantsAdults aged ≥18 years with (n=6084) and without (n=6161) self-reported DED were recruited via emails and screened.Main outcome measuresAll participants completed National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) and EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). All DED participants completed the Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Visual Analogue Scale, and Ocular Comfort Index and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem questionnaires. In addition, half of the respondents with DED completed Survey A (Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life) and the other half completed Survey B (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire) and Dry Eye Questionnaire-5.ResultsParticipants with self-reported DED had lower functional vision and lower overall health status than participants without self-reported DED as measured by the NEI-VFQ and EQ-5D-5L, respectively.Increasing self-reported DED severity as measured by the EDS was shown to correspond with worse symptom severity/frequency, lower functional vision, higher impact on work productivity, daily activities and QoL.ConclusionThis study showed that patients’ reported burden of self-reported DED was similar across the eight European countries. Those with self-reported DED reported lower health status and functional vision compared to those without self-reported DED and these parameters worsen with increasing disease severity.

No abstract

Introduction Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is an inherited retinal pathology associated with “night blindness” and progressive loss of peripheral vision, in some cases leading to complete blindness. Health state utility values are required for activities such as modelling disease burden or the cost-effectiveness of new interventions. The current study aimed to generate utility values for health states of varying levels of functional vision in RP, with members of the general public in the UK. Methods Five health states were defined according to standard clinical measures of visual ability. Health state descriptions were developed following interviews with patients with RP in the UK (n=5). Further interviews were conducted for confirmation with healthcare professionals with specific experience of managing patients with RP in the UK (n=2). Interviews with members of the general public in the UK were conducted to value health states. A time trade-off (TTO) process based on the established Measurement and Valuation of Health (MVH) protocol was used. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, all interviews were web-enabled and conducted 1:1 by a trained moderator. Results In total, n=110 TTO interviews were conducted with members of the UK general public. Mean TTO utility values followed the logical and expected order, with increasing visual impairment leading to decreased utility. Mean values varied between 0.78 ± 0.20 (“moderate impairment”), and 0.33 ± 0.26 (“hand motion” to “no light perception”). Supplementary visual analogue scale (VAS) scores also followed the logical and expected order: mean VAS values varied between 47.95 ± 15.38 (“moderate impairment”) and 17.22 ± 12.49 in (“hand motion” to “no light perception”). Discussion These data suggest that individuals living with RP have substantially impaired quality of life. Utility values for RP have been elicited here using a method and sample that is suitable for economic modelling and health technology assessment purposes.

Background Dry eye disease (DED), Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and Sjögren’s syndrome dry eye disease (SS-DED) are eye dryness conditions that show significant overlap in various symptoms of ocular discomfort. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the patient experience and evaluate content validity of the newly developed Dry Eye Disease Questionnaire (DED-Q). Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 61 US adults who reported experiencing ocular symptoms due to their physician-confirmed primary diagnosis of DED (n = 21), MGD (n = 20), or SS-DED (n = 20). The open-ended concept-elicitation phase was followed by cognitive debriefing (CD) of the DED-Q to evaluate participants’ understanding and relevance of the instructions, items, response options, and recall periods. Interviews were also conducted with eight specialist healthcare professionals to assess clinical relevance of the concepts included. Verbatim interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in ATLAS.ti v8 software. Results A total of 29 symptoms and 14 impacts on quality of life were reported across participant interviews. Primary ocular symptoms reported included eye dryness (n = 61/61; 100%), eye irritation (n = 55/61; 90%), eye itch (n = 54/61; 89%), burning sensation (n = 52/61; 85%), and foreign body sensation (n = 51/61; 84%). The most impacted aspects of daily life were using digital screens (n = 46/61; 75%), driving (n = 45/61; 74%), working (n = 39/61; 64%), and reading (n = 37/61; 61%). CD findings showed most participants had good understanding of DED-Q items and confirmed most concepts were relevant to the lived experience of their condition. Aside from few minor changes to the items and examples to facilitate more accurate interpretation, the proposed instruction wording was modified for various symptom and impact modules to encourage participants to focus only on dry eye vision problems. Conclusions This research identified multiple prevalent symptoms and impacts of DED, MGD, and SS-DED, most of which were similar across the conditions. The DED-Q was confirmed to be a content-valid PRO measure suitable for use in clinical studies to assess the patient experience of DED, MGD, and SS-DED. Future work will focus on evaluating the psychometric properties of the DED-Q for use as an efficacy endpoint in clinical trials.

No abstract