No abstract

In our series, 7 cases required explantation of the original titanium implant. In these cases a vigorous fibrotic reaction had taken place between the orbital contents and the titanium mesh implant. We postulate that the fibrous reaction between the implant and the orbital contents caused the eye movement restriction and the lid retraction. Implant materials used in orbital floor fracture surgery should be inert with a flat profile rather than a mesh to prevent adhesions through the mesh that may cause cicatricial eye movement restriction and eyelid retraction.

The choice of enucleation and evisceration for removal of an eye remains controversial in certain circumstances. An international panel was asked to give their surgical management of two clinical cases that require either enucleation or evisceration. Case one follows multiple vitreoretinal procedures, and the risk of sympathetic ophthalmia is considered in the surgical management. Case two has had postoperative endophthalmitis, and the possibility of implant infection following insertion of an orbital implant with evisceration and enucleation is discussed.

We describe three cases of periocular edema with histopathologic features of intralymphatic histiocytosis without extravascular granulomas. All were elderly males with no other significant medical problems. Previous reports of periocular Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome are identical clinically, and some reports show illustrations of intralymphatic histiocytosis histopathologically, in addition to other features typical of the syndrome. Given the lack of associated diseases or other features of the Melkersson-Rosenthal triad, some of these cases may be better defined as periocular intralymphatic histiocytosis.

Dirofilarial involvement of the orbit is uncommon. It should be considered as a rare infectious form of specific orbital inflammation and considered in the differential diagnosis of orbital inflammatory lesions.