Many patients with a positive antinuclear antibody test are incorrectly given a diagnosis of SLE and sometimes treated with toxic medications. The data support the importance of continuing medical education for community physicians in screening for autoimmune diseases and identifying patients who may benefit from early referral to a specialist.

Objective-Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies are a serological marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); up to 10%-15% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are also positive. While anti-CCP in RA is citrulline-dependent, anti-CCP in some other diseases is citrulline-independent and reacts with both CCP and the unmodified (arginine-containing) cyclic arginine peptide (CAP). We investigated the citrulline dependence of anti-CCP and its significance in the arthritis of SLE.Methods-IgG anti-CCP was compared by ELISA to anti-CAP in sera from patients with SLE (n = 335) and RA (n = 47) and healthy controls (n = 35). SLE patients were divided into 5 groups based on their joint involvement: subset I: deforming/erosive arthritis (n = 20); II: arthritis fulfilling (or likely fulfilling) American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA but without erosions (n = 18); III: joint swelling but not fulfilling RA criteria (n = 39); IV: arthritis without documented joint swelling (n = 194); and V: no arthritis (n = 58).Results-Anti-CCP (> 1.7 units) was found in 68% (32/47) of patients with RA and 17% (55/329) of those with SLE. It was more common in SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis (38%). High anti-CCP (> 10 units) was found in RA (26%) and deforming/erosive SLE (12%). High anti-CCP/CAP ratios (> 2, indicating a selectivity to CCP) were found in 91% of anti-CCP-positive RA and 50% of anti-CCP-positive SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis. Patients from subset II did not have high anti-CCP/CAP. Conclusion-Citrulline dependence or high levels (> 10) of anti-CCP were common in SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis, while most anti-CCP in SLE patients was citrullineindependent. This may be useful in identifying a subset of SLE patients with high risk for development of deforming/erosive arthritis.

Objective. To investigate the clinical and immunologic significance of autoantibodies to RNA helicase A (RHA) in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.Methods. The study group comprised 1,119 individuals enrolled in the University of Florida Center for Autoimmune Diseases registry from 2000 to 2005. Diagnoses were based on standard criteria. Autoantibodies were analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blot assays.Results. Anti-RHA was observed in 17 (6.2%) of 276 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 2 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, and 3 other patients, but anti-RHA was not observed in any patient with polymyositis/dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjögren's syndrome. Anti-RHA was present in only 2.9% of African American patients, compared with 6.0% of white patients and 12-25% of patients of other races; this was in striking contrast to the frequency of anti-Sm in African American patients (27.2%). Among patients with SLE, anti-RHA was common in young patients (26% of those whose initial visit was at an age younger than 20 years versus 3-4% of those who were initially seen at ages 20-49 years) and at an early stage of disease (23% of those whose first clinic visit was within 1 year of disease onset versus 2-8% of those whose first visit was at least 1 year after disease onset). In 9 of 11 patients, levels of anti-RHA decreased to <10% of the initial value within 9-37 months, while levels of coexisting anti-Ro or anti-Su remained the same. New specificities developed in 2 patients (antinuclear RNP and anti-Sm, and anti-ribosomal P, respectively). These data suggest that the level of anti-RHA diminishes over time, and that anti-RHA is regulated via a mechanism different from that for other lupus-related autoantibodies.Conclusion. Anti-RHA is a new serologic marker for SLE. It is produced mainly in young non-African Americans at an early stage of their disease. Anti-RHA has a unique tendency to diminish over time.

Background. There is a notable lack of education on nutrition and physical activity guidelines in medical schools and postgraduate training. The purpose of this study is to assess the nutrition and exercise knowledge and personal health behaviors of physicians in the Department of Medicine at a large academic center. Methods. We conducted a survey study in the Department of Medicine at the University of Florida in 2018. The survey instrument included questions on demographics, medical comorbidities, baseline perception of health and fitness, and knowledge of nutrition concepts. The Duke Activity Status Index assessed activity/functional capacity and the validated 14-point Mediterranean Diet Survey evaluated dietary preferences. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the χ2 test was used to perform comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was determined at P < .05. Results. Out of 331 eligible physicians, 303 (92%) participated in the study. While all respondents agreed that eating well is important for health, less than a fourth followed facets of a plant-based Mediterranean diet. Only 25% correctly identified the American Heart Association recommended number of fruit and vegetable servings per day and fewer still (20%) were aware of the recommended daily added sugar limit for adults. Forty-six percent knew the American Heart Association physical activity recommendations and 52% reported more than 3 hours of personal weekly exercise. Reported fruit and vegetable consumption correlated with perceived level of importance of nutrition as well as nutrition knowledge. Forty percent of physicians (102/253) who considered nutrition at least somewhat important reported a minimum of 2 vegetable and 3 fruit servings per day, compared with 7% (3/44) of those who considered nutrition less important (“neutral,” “not important,” or “important, but I don’t have the time to focus on it right now”; P < .0001). Conclusions. This study highlights the need for significant improvement in education of physicians about nutrition and physical activity and need for physicians to focus on good personal health behaviors, which may potentially improve with better education.

No abstract