Background: Several uterotonic options exist for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH); hence, cost-effectiveness is an important decision-making criterion affecting uterotonic choice.Objective: To conduct a systematic review of cost-effectiveness of uterotonics for PPH prevention to support a WHO guideline update.
Background
Several uterotonic options exist for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH); hence, cost‐effectiveness is an important decision‐making criterion affecting uterotonic choice.
Objective
To conduct a systematic review of cost‐effectiveness of uterotonics for PPH prevention to support a WHO guideline update.
Search strategy
We searched major databases from 1980 to June 2018 and the National Health Services Economic Evaluation (NHS EED) database from inception (1995) to March 2015 for eligible studies.
Selection criteria
We included comparative economic evaluations, cost‐utility analyses, and resource‐utilization studies.
Data collection and analysis
Two reviewers independently assessed studies and extracted data organized by birth mode and setting.
Main results
We included 15 studies across all income categories that compared misoprostol versus no uterotonic (five studies) or versus oxytocin (one study), carbetocin versus oxytocin (eight studies), and one study comparing numerous uterotonics. In specific low‐resource contexts, we found reasonably good evidence that misoprostol was cost‐effective compared with no uterotonic. In the context of cesarean delivery, carbetocin was more cost favorable than oxytocin but certainty of this evidence was low.
Conclusions
Evidence on the cost‐effectiveness of various uterotonic agents was not generalizable. As the number of competing uterotonics increases, rigorous economic evaluations including contextual factors are needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.