BackgroundAcne vulgaris is a pilosebaceous follicle disorder affecting over 85% of
adolescents to some degree. It frequently causes psychological distress that
may persist into adulthood due to scarring. Little information about
post-acne scarring epidemiology is available.ObjectivesTo describe prevalence, distribution patterns and associated factors of acne
scarring in young males, drawing on a representative population sample from
a southern Brazilian city.MethodsA cross-sectional study was undertaken during presentation for military
service, which is compulsory for all 18-year-old males. A questionnaire was
applied, covering topics like diet, smoking habits, ethnicity, family
structure, socio-economic level, as well as specific questions about active
acne and resulting scars. Dermatologists conducted the clinical
examination.ResultsA total of 2,201 male adolescents were interviewed and examined. The overall
prevalence of acne scarring was 22%. The malar region was the most
frequently involved, present in 80% of affected individuals, followed by the
frontal region (31.5%), back (17%), anterior chest (8.2%) and mentonian
region (6.4%). Correlation between the intensity of clinical acne and the
presence of scars was found, but no association was observed with
educational level, smoking, ethnicity, obesity or socio-economic status.ConclusionsThere is a high prevalence of acne scars among this population. This is the
first study to ascertain a correlation between acne scarring and factors
such as socio-economic status and educational level. The direct relation
between acne severity and scarring indicates that prompt and effective
treatment is the best way to reduce scarring.
Background: Prevalence of acne varies worldwide. Several factors (age, skin color, body fat, diet, and smoking) have been investigated as risk factors. Objective: A total of 2,201 18-year-old males living in Pelotas, South Brazil, were evaluated in order to examine the prevalence of acne and associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional population-based study was conducted. A dermatologist performed the clinical examination of the face and trunk for identification of acne lesions. Acne was evaluated as clinically noninflammatory, inflammatory, and acne with both types of lesions. Skin color, schooling, height, smoking, skinfolds, waist circumference, BMI, and dietary dairy intake were the independent variables used. Results: A response rate of 97.2% was obtained. Individuals without any acne lesion were 241 (10.9%); 161 (7.3%) only had noninflammatory lesions, 404 (18.4%) only inflammatory lesions; and 1,395 (63.4%) presented both types of lesions. In multivariate analysis, the type of lesions was different in light and dark skin phototype adolescents, with more common inflammatory lesions in the light phototype and noninflammatory ones in the dark phototype patients. Height was directly associated with the occurrence of all types of acne, whereas lower fat mass was associated with the occurrence of noninflammatory acne. While daily consumption of whole milk or yogurt was found to be associated with inflammatory acne in crude analysis, the association with milk was not detected and that with yogurt was low in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our results suggest that future studies should explore determinants of noninflammatory and inflammatory acne separately, especially if mixed populations are studied.
Infections caused by dermathophytes in the scrotal skin are uncommon especially due to Microsporum gypseum, which may form scutular or favus-like lesions. We report two patients with this type of tinea: one immune suppressed by HIV infection and another immunocompetent without comorbidity. In the literature we found only two reports in immunocompetent patients and some in immune suppressed with similar symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.