No abstract

Study Objective To compare rates of nephrotoxicity, time to nephrotoxicity onset, and clinical failure among patients who received continuous infusion (C‐I) or intermittent infusion (I‐I) vancomycin in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dl or a 50% increase from baseline for two consecutive measurements while receiving vancomycin during OPAT. Clinical failure was defined as unplanned readmission, extension of therapy, or change in antibiotics. Design Single‐center propensity score‐matched retrospective cohort study. Setting OPAT clinic affiliated with two nearby hospitals. Patients We identified 300 patients who received C‐I or I‐I vancomycin for at least 1 week in the OPAT program between October 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, and infection was performed to minimize differences in patient characteristics between groups. Measurements and Main Results After propensity score matching and exclusion criteria, 74 patients were included in each cohort. Continuous infusion vancomycin was associated with a 3.22‐fold decrease in nephrotoxicity risk (C‐I 6.8% [5/74 patients] vs I‐I 18.9% [14/74 patients]; odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.10–9.46, p=0.027) and a significantly slower onset to nephrotoxicity compared with I‐I (p=0.035). No statistically significant difference in clinical failure rates was observed between the C‐I and I‐I groups (13.5% [10/74 patients] vs 23.0% [17/74 patients], p=0.147). Conclusion In an OPAT setting, C‐I vancomycin was associated with a lower risk of and slower onset to nephrotoxicity than I‐I vancomycin; however, no statistically significant difference in clinical failure rates was observed with C‐I versus I‐I vancomycin.

Background Ceftriaxone and azithromycin are common empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Despite low suspicion for atypical infection, azithromycin is often continued for a full course. Negative laboratory data for atypical bacteria may assist with azithromycin de-escalation. Thus, a pharmacist-driven azithromycin de-escalation protocol was implemented for immunocompetent, non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients treated for CAP. The primary outcome was to compare azithromycin duration before and after protocol implementation. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and all-cause 30-day readmission. Methods This was a single-center, quasi-experimental study of hospitalized, non-ICU patients treated with azithromycin and a beta-lactam for CAP. The pre- and post-intervention cohorts were from 07/01/2018–04/30/2019 and 07/01/2019–04/30/2020, respectively. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with CAP, and had a negative Legionella pneumophila urinary antigen and negative nasopharyngeal swab PCR for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Patients were excluded if they were immunocompromised, admitted to an ICU, prescribed azithromycin for an alternative indication, or had evidence of atypical bacteria. Results After exclusion criteria were applied, 90 and 100 patients were included in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics were mostly similar between cohorts. This initiative was associated with a statistically significant decrease in azithromycin duration (2 days (IQR 1–2.75) vs. 5 days (IQR 3–6), p < 0.001) and hospital LOS (3 days (IQR 2–5) vs. 5 days (IQR 3–8.25), p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause 30-day readmission (14 days (15.6%) vs 13 days (13.0%), p=0.614). Conclusion Implementation of a pharmacist-driven azithromycin de-escalation protocol for CAP was associated with reduced azithromycin duration and hospital LOS, but not all-cause 30-day readmission. Disclosures Jeffrey Steele, PharMD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Advisor or Review Panel member) Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, Melinta (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Theratechnologies, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member)