Despite the success of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, data on physiologic indices and optimal inflation/deflation timing control of chronic counterpulsation devices are unclear. This study explored the acute hemodynamic and metabolic efficacy of a novel 40-ml stroke volume paraaortic blood pump (PABP) versus a standard intraaortic balloon pump (IABP). Acute porcine model was used with eight pigs randomly divided into PABP (n = 4) and IABP (n = 4) groups. Hemodynamic and metabolic measurements were obtained with and without mechanical assistance. In one pig, the inflation/deflation control was adjusted to different settings, with corresponding performance indices measured. The PABP significantly improved classical counterpulsation indices (p ≤ 0.05) and achieved an average beneficial effect on these indices 1.5-3.5 times greater than that of the IABP. Classical metabolic indices (tension time index and endocardial viability ratio [EVR]), and indices new to chronic counterpulsation research (coronary perfusion, left ventricular stroke work (SW), and a newly derived EVR) were also used in assessment. Both IABP assistance and PABP assistance improved these physiologic indices, with a trend toward PABP superiority in reducing left ventricular SW (p = 0.08). An optimal PABP deflation timing occurs during systole (25 milliseconds after the R-wave) and can minimize coronary regurgitation.
The ePTFE trileaflet-valved conduits for pulmonary valve reconstruction showed acceptable performance and outcomes in the ex vivo and in vivo experiments. The ePTFE trileaflet-valved conduit may be clinically useful, although additional studies in animals should be conducted to determine its long-term outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.