Background: Percutaneous interventions for aorto-ostial narrowing of native coronary arteries are challenging because of early elastic recoil after the procedure and the high restenosis rate. Cutting balloon angioplasty may reduce this complication. Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty and stent implantation for aorto-ostial lesions with a 1-year clinical follow-up. Methods: All patients with aorto-ostial lesions in our laboratory underwent cutting balloon angioplasty and were followed for approximately 1 year. Results: Forty-eight patients underwent balloon angioplasty; 36 of whom had lesions in the ostial right coronary artery, and 12 of whom had lesions in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Thirty-five patients (73%) had a stent implanted. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. The in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) was 2.1% because of the death of 1 patient following urgent bypass surgery. Mean clinical follow-up was 11.6 ± 7 month. Twelve patients (27%) required repeat coronary angiography, and restenosis was found in 7 patients (16%). Six patients (13.6%) had MACEs. Conclusions: Cutting balloon angioplasty in combination with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation has a good clinical outcome. This technique should be compared with implantation of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in a controlled study.
Distal protection devices protect only a single distal vessel. We describe a novel technique to protect both branches following a thrombus-containing bifurcation lesion. The combination of an occlusive balloon and an arterial filter system provides an attractive solution to the challenging environment of a lesion at high risk for distal embolization supplying more than a single major branch.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.