To assess the outcome of orthodontic treatment, 224 cases treated in a postgraduate clinic were evaluated. Pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2) and 5-year follow-up (T3) study casts were assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The influence of various factors upon treatment and long-term outcome was analysed. According to the PAR Index, orthodontic treatment reduced the malocclusions on average by 76.7 per cent, and at follow-up the reduction was 63.8 per cent. Follow-up stability was good for 76.3 per cent of the cases. Some cases (4.0 per cent) even improved, while moderate to severe post-treatment relapse occurred in 19.7 per cent of the cases. Orthodontic treatment changed Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions to near ideal occlusion (PAR scores 4.4-6.8). No long-term interaction between the groups was discovered. Sex and extraction/non-extraction treatments did not significantly affect the results. The initial PAR score accounted for 77.8 per cent of the variation in treatment PAR score change (T1-T2), and for 61.8 per cent of the variation of long-term PAR score change (T1-T3). Age at treatment start accounted significantly for the variability of treatment changes (P < 0.001). The PAR score at the end of treatment had some explanatory importance (R2 = 0.099) for the long-term (T1-T3) result. However, PAR score changes in the follow-up period were difficult to predict.

No abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between occlusion, satisfaction with dental appearance, and self-esteem at the ages of 11 (T1) and 15 years (T2), and to study perceived treatment effects. Separate questionnaires were completed by children and their parents to determine their attitude. The dental casts of 224 children were collected at T1 and T2, and assessed by the Aesthetic Component (AC) and Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), and Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. At T2, 16 children had been treated with removable and 51 with fixed appliances, while 157 were untreated. The children in the fixed appliance group had better dental aesthetics (AC) and occlusion (DHC) than those in the two other groups. Average PAR score reduction was 71.6 per cent (T1-T2) and satisfaction with own or child's dental appearance increased significantly. The untreated group showed increased malocclusions. In spite of that, the children expressed higher satisfaction with their own dental appearance at T2 than at T1, while the parents' satisfaction level was unchanged. For the total group, orthodontic concern at T1, AC at T2, and gender accounted for 18.0 per cent of the variation in the children's satisfaction with their own dental appearance. Parents' concern at T1 and AC at T2 accounted for 32.2 per cent of the variation in parents' satisfaction. Improvement in self-esteem from 11 to 15 years was not correlated with treatment changes. A gender difference was found. The answers to the questionnaire indicated that both children and parents rate pleasant aesthetics as an important factor for psychosocial well being.

No abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate root lengthening during orthodontic treatment in relation to the age of the patient, the developmental stage of the root, and the anticipated growth. Specifically, the potential benefit of treating young teeth was addressed. The sample consisted of 80 patients with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions, treated with extraction of at least two maxillary first premolars, and edgewise technique with 0.018-inch slot brackets. Additionally, a cross-sectional control group of 66 untreated individuals matched to gender, and pre- and post-treatment age of the experimental group was included. Crown and root lengths of the maxillary incisors were measured on peri-apical radiographs before and after treatment, and corrected for image distortion. The stage of root development before treatment was recorded. Root elongation during treatment was found for 50 out of the 280 examined teeth. Age at treatment start was significantly higher among the patients showing root shortening of the lateral incisors during treatment than among those showing root elongation (P < 0.05). The stage of root development was significantly related to the direction of root length change, i.e. shortening or elongation. Roots elongated during treatment did not differ in length from untreated teeth of similarly aged individuals. There was no significant difference in the extent of root lengthening between the roots elongated during treatment and the normal root lengthening in age-matched untreated individuals. Post-treatment root length was significantly related to pre-treatment age. Roots that were incompletely developed before treatment reached a significantly greater length than those that were fully developed at the start of treatment. The results of this study show a definite advantage for younger teeth with regard to post-treatment root length. This finding may influence treatment planning strategy.