Long-term neuronal plasticity is known to be dependent on rapid de novo synthesis of mRNA and protein, and recent studies provide insight into the molecules involved in this response. Here, we demonstrate that mRNA encoding a member of the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) family, RGS2, is rapidly induced in neurons of the hippocampus, cortex, and striatum in response to stimuli that evoke plasticity. Although several members of the RGS family are expressed in brain with discrete neuronal localizations, RGS2 appears unique in that its expression is dynamically responsive to neuronal activity. In biochemical assays, RGS2 stimulates the GTPase activity of the alpha subunit of Gq and Gi1. The effect on Gi1 was observed only after reconstitution of the protein in phospholipid vesicles containing M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. RGS2 also inhibits both Gq- and Gi-dependent responses in transfected cells. These studies suggest a novel mechanism linking neuronal activity and signal transduction.
RGS proteins serve as GTPase-activating proteins and/or effector antagonists to modulate G␣ signaling events. In live cells, members of the B/R4 subfamily of RGS proteins selectively modulate G protein signaling depending on the associated receptor (GPCR). Here we examine whether GPCRs selectively recruit RGS proteins to modulate linked G protein signaling. We report the novel finding that RGS2 binds directly to the third intracellular (i3) loop of the G q/11 -coupled M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor (M1 mAChR; M1i3). This interaction is selective because closely related RGS16 does not bind M1i3, and neither RGS2 nor RGS16 binds to the G i/o -coupled M2i3 loop. When expressed in cells, RGS2 and M1 mAChR co-localize to the plasma membrane whereas RGS16 does not. The N-terminal region of RGS2 is both necessary and sufficient for binding to M1i3, and RGS2 forms a stable heterotrimeric complex with both activated G q ␣ and M1i3. RGS2 potently inhibits M1 mAChR-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in cell membranes by acting as an effector antagonist. Deletion of the N terminus abolishes this effector antagonist activity of RGS2 but not its GTPase-activating protein activity toward G 11 ␣ in membranes. These findings predict a model where the i3 loops of GPCRs selectively recruit specific RGS protein(s) via their N termini to regulate the linked G protein. Consistent with this model, we find that the i3 loops of the mAChR subtypes (M1-M5) exhibit differential profiles for binding distinct B/R4 RGS family members, indicating that this novel mechanism for GPCR modulation of RGS signaling may generally extend to other receptors and RGS proteins.Cells rely upon G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) 1 to convey signals from extracellular hormones and neurotransmitters to intracellular effectors and linked signaling pathways. Agonist occupancy of the GPCR activates a heterotrimeric G protein (G␣␥) by catalyzing the exchange of GDP for GTP on the G␣ subunit (1). This initiates dissociation of the trimer into free G␣ and G␥, which independently or in coordinated fashion activate downstream effectors and linked signaling pathways. Members of the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins are direct modulators of G protein activity. RGS proteins are best understood as GTPaseactivating proteins (GAPs), which bind to the activated form of G␣ and accelerate its GTPase activity thereby promoting the termination of G protein signaling (2-5). By virtue of their interactions with activated G␣, RGS proteins also serve as effector antagonists to block activation of downstream effector molecules (6, 7).All RGS proteins share a conserved RGS core domain of ϳ130 amino acids that contains binding sites for G␣ and is responsible for their GAP activity (5,8,9). Outside of the RGS domain, however, the more than 30 family members are widely divergent. Some RGS proteins are quite complex and contain multiple domains for binding a variety of signaling proteins. Other RGS proteins are simple, with relatively short, featureless N...
Regulators of heterotrimeric G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that accelerate GTP hydrolysis by G q and G i ␣ subunits, thus attenuating signaling. Mechanisms that provide more precise regulatory specificity have been elusive. We report here that an N-terminal domain of RGS4 discriminated among receptor signaling complexes coupled via G q . Accordingly, deletion of the N-terminal domain of RGS4 eliminated receptor selectivity and reduced potency by 10 4 -fold. Receptor selectivity and potency of inhibition were partially restored when the RGS4 box was added together with an N-terminal peptide. In vitro reconstitution experiments also indicated that sequences flanking the RGS4 box were essential for high potency GAP activity. Thus, RGS4 regulates G q class signaling by the combined action of two domains: 1) the RGS box accelerates GTP hydrolysis by G␣ q and 2) the N terminus conveys high affinity and receptor-selective inhibition. These activities are each required for receptor selectivity and high potency inhibition of receptor-coupled G q signaling.Heterotrimeric G proteins of the G q class are mediators of Ca 2ϩ responses in animal cells. Signaling is initiated by agonist binding to heptahelical transmembrane receptors complexed with G q ␣␥ and phospholipase C- (PLC) 1 (1), which generates IP 3 to trigger Ca 2ϩ release from internal stores (2).Many cells express several G q -coupled receptors that regulate the location, intensity, and propagation of intracellular Ca 2ϩ waves. For example, pancreatic acini respond to acetylcholine, bombesin, and cholecystokinin by activating the same set of G q class proteins and mobilizing the same Ca 2ϩ pool, but each receptor evokes distinct patterns of Ca 2ϩ waves (3). Ca 2ϩ release may be regulated by intracellular proteins that interact with guanine nucleotide binding proteins, such as regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins.2 RGS proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that accelerate GTP hydrolysis by G q and G i ␣ subunits, thus attenuating signaling (5-8). Mammals express over 20 different RGS proteins, of which RGS4 has received the most extensive biochemical characterization (5, 7-12). RGS4 is composed of a central domain of 120 amino acids that is homologous to other RGS proteins, termed the RGS box, flanked by less well conserved N-and C-terminal sequences (13). In rat pancreatic acinar cells, RGS4 preferentially inhibited G q/11 -mediated signaling evoked by carbachol relative to bombesin and cholecystokinin regardless of the identity of the G q class ␣ subunit. 2Regulatory specificity was apparently conferred by direct or indirect interaction between RGS4 and the receptor.In the present study, we used deletion mutations to identify two domains in RGS4 that regulate agonist-dependent Ca 2ϩ signaling. The RGS box accelerates GTP hydrolysis by G␣ q whereas the N terminus conveys high affinity and receptorselective inhibition. These combined activities are required for receptor selectivity and high potency i...
Cooperativity has been investigated as the mechanistic basis for effects observed with cardiac muscarinic receptors in washed membranes from Syrian hamsters. Specifically, N-[3H]methylscopolamine labeled only 66-75% of the sites labeled by [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate at apparently saturating concentrations of each radioligand. Also, receptors labeled by N-[3H]methylscopolamine revealed three states of affinity for agonists, both in native membranes and following irreversible blockade of about 80% of the sites by propylbenzilylcholine mustard; in both preparations, guanylylimidodiphosphate (GMP-PNP) effected an apparent interconversion of sites from higher to lower affinity for agonists and from lower to higher affinity for the antagonist. Excellent and mechanistically consistent descriptions of the data were obtained in terms of a model comprising cooperative and noncooperative forms of the receptor; the former was described by a variant of the Adair equation, and the latter was included to account for low-affinity sites that survived treatment with the mustard. If differences in apparent capacity derive from negative cooperativity in the binding of N-[3H]methylscopolamine, the cooperative form of the receptor was at least trivalent in native membranes; otherwise, constraints imposed by the effects of GMP-PNP at the concentrations of radioligand used in the assays dictate that the cooperative form of the receptor was at least tetravalent. In contrast, a divalent receptor is sufficient with the data from alkylated membranes, in accord with the reduced likelihood of interactions between functional sites within an oligomeric array. A model is presented wherein the receptor interconverts spontaneously between two or more states differing in their cooperative properties. The effects of GMP-PNP can be rationalized as a shift in the equilibrium between the different states.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.