For the advancement of Class V restoratives, our goal was to evaluate the physicochemical and mechanical properties, antimicrobial functionality, and cytotoxic potential of novel antimicrobial copolymers. 5-Carboxy-N-(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl)-N,N-dimethylpentan-1-aminium bromide (AMadh1) and 10-carboxy-N-(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl)-N,N-dimethyldecan-1-aminium bromide (AMadh2) were incorporated into light-curable urethane dimethacrylate, polyethylene glycol–extended urethane dimethacrylate, ethyl 2-(hydroxymethyl) acrylate resin (UPE resin). In the AMadhs-UPE resin, the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance, degree of vinyl conversion, flexural strength, elastic modulus, and shear bond strength were assessed. Antimicrobial properties were measured using Streptococcus mutans (planktonic and biofilm). Cytotoxicity was tested using human gingival fibroblasts and mouse connective tissue fibroblasts (ATCC® CCL-1™) exposed to two-fold serial dilutions (≤10.6 mmol/L AMadh1 or ≤8.8 mmol/L AMadh2). At 10% mass of AMadh, the attained degree of vinyl conversion values (AMadh1 = 90.1% and AMadh2 = 88.5%) were not statistically different from the UPE resin (88.1%). At both AMadh levels, the flexural strength was reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Elastic modulus and contact angle were not significantly affected by AMadh1. Variations in elastic modulus and contact angle were observed with AMadh2; however, this does not disqualify it in future design of Class V restoratives. Compared to UPE resin, AMadh1-UPE and AMadh2-UPE (10% mass) copolymers reduced S. mutans biofilm 4.2- and 1.6-fold, respectively (p ≤ 0.006). In direct contact with human gingival fibroblasts or ATCC CCL-1 cells, at biologically relevant concentrations, the AMadhs did not adversely affect cell viability or their metabolic activity. This effort addresses a significant oral health issue associated with elderly populations. Its successful completion is expected to yield dental restoratives with well-controlled biofunction.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of endodontic access hole preparation on fracture resistance of translucent zirconia (5Y) and conventional zirconia crowns (3Y) with varying occlusal thicknesses. Materials and Methods Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dies, representing a prepared tooth, were milled. Zirconia crowns with 1 mm thick axial walls and varying occlusal thicknesses were milled from 3Y (Cercon HT) or 5Y (Cercon XT) zirconia discs and sintered. 160 crowns were divided into 16 groups (n = 10 per group) based on the zirconia type (3Y, 5Y), occlusal thickness (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mm), and access hole preparation (with access hole, control). Crowns were cemented on the PMMA dies with resin‐modified glass ionomer cement (Rely X Luting Plus) under constant weight (500 g) and thermocycled for 10,000 cycles. In half of the samples, following 5000 cycles of thermocycling, a uniform endodontic access hole was created using a diamond bur and restored immediately with resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3M ESPE). The fracture resistance of the specimens was tested on an Instron 5566 universal testing machine with a stainless steel ball indenter (9.0 mm dia.) and the maximum load before failure was recorded as fracture load (N). Three‐way ANOVA testing examined the effect of zirconia type, occlusal thickness, and access hole preparation on fracture loads of the crowns. Statistical tests were two‐sided and significance level was set at 95% (α = 0.05). Results Fracture load was significantly affected by the type of zirconia, occlusal thickness, and access hole preparation (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed that access hole preparation significantly reduced the fracture load of 3Y crowns with 0.5 or 1.0 mm of occlusal thickness and 5Y zirconia crowns with 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mm of occlusal thickness (p < 0.05). Increasing occlusal thickness reduced the effect of access hole preparation on fracture load. Conclusion Type of zirconia, occlusal thickness, and access hole preparation had significant effects on the fracture load of zirconia crowns. The effect of endodontic access was significant on the 3Y and 5Y zirconia crowns with ≤1.0 and ≤1.5 mm occlusal thicknesses, respectively.