No abstract

Most chronic calcifying pancreatitis patients with common bile duct strictures respond to the increasing numbers of endoscopic stents, and remain stent free for medium term periods. Less patients (30%) does not benefit of biliary stenting, who are candidates for surgery.

Background and aimNo marker to categorise the severity of chronic intestinal failure (CIF) has been developed. A 1-year international survey was carried out to investigate whether the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism clinical classification of CIF, based on the type and volume of the intravenous supplementation (IVS), could be an indicator of CIF severity.MethodsAt baseline, participating home parenteral nutrition (HPN) centres enrolled all adults with ongoing CIF due to non-malignant disease; demographic data, body mass index, CIF mechanism, underlying disease, HPN duration and IVS category were recorded for each patient. The type of IVS was classified as fluid and electrolyte alone (FE) or parenteral nutrition admixture (PN). The mean daily IVS volume, calculated on a weekly basis, was categorised as <1, 1–2, 2–3 and >3 L/day. The severity of CIF was determined by patient outcome (still on HPN, weaned from HPN, deceased) and the occurrence of major HPN/CIF-related complications: intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), catheter-related venous thrombosis and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI).ResultsFifty-one HPN centres included 2194 patients. The analysis showed that both IVS type and volume were independently associated with the odds of weaning from HPN (significantly higher for PN <1 L/day than for FE and all PN >1 L/day), patients’ death (lower for FE, p=0.079), presence of IFALD cholestasis/liver failure and occurrence of CRBSI (significantly higher for PN 2–3 and PN >3 L/day).ConclusionsThe type and volume of IVS required by patients with CIF could be indicators to categorise the severity of CIF in both clinical practice and research protocols.

Background and aim. The safety and effectiveness of an HPN program depends on both the expertise and the management procedures of the HPN center. We aimed to know the modalities needed to provide the home parenteral nutrition (HPN)-program and the types of intravenous supplementation (IVS)-admixtures supplied to patients with chronic intestinal failure (CIF) in different countries. Methods. In March 2015, 65 centers from 22 countries enrolled 3239 patients (benign disease 90.1%, malignant disease 9.9%), recording the patient, CIF and HPN characteristics in a structured database. The HPN-provider was categorized as health care system local pharmacy (LP) or home care company (HCC). The IVS-admixture was categorized as fluids and electrolytes alone (FE) or parenteral nutrition, either commercially premixed (PA) or customized to the individual patient (CA), alone or plus extra FE (PAFE or CAFE). Results. HPN-provider: HCC 66%, LP 34%; no difference between benign-CIF and malignant-CIF. LP was the main modality in 11 Countries; HCC prevailed in 4 European countries, Israel, USA, South America and Oceania (p<0.001). IVS-admixture: FE 10%, PA 17%, PAFE 17%, CA 38%, CAFE 18%. PA+PAFE use was greater in malignant-CIF and CA+CAFE use was greater in benign-CIF (p<0.001). PA+PAFE prevailed in those Countries where LP was the main HPN-provider and CA+CAFE prevailed where the main HPN-provider was HCC (p<0.001). Conclusions. The HPN provision and the IVS-admixture types differ greatly among countries, among HPN centers and between benign-CIF and malignant-CIF. As both HPN provider and IVS-admixture types may play a role in the safety and effectiveness of HPN therapy, criteria to homogenize HPN programs are needed, to give patients the same opportunity to receive appropriate HPN therapy.

No abstract