The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of anorganic bovine bone matrix (i.e. Bio-oss) as a grafting material for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male rhesus monkeys (i.e. Macaca mulatta) the 1st, 2nd and 3rd maxillary molars on one side of the jaws were extracted. The remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the bottom of the sinus was then reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed on one side of the jaws in each monkey and the sinuses were grafted with the bovine bone matrix. At that time, 2 IMZ pure titanium plasma coated implants were immediately placed into the augmented sinuses (i.e. simultaneous implants-loaded group). After 4 months, 2 additional similar implants were placed into these previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed implants-loaded group). Four months later, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice of the animals). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that the extractions were performed 7 months after those in the opposite side and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous implants-unloaded group and delayed implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded implants were stable at the day of sacrifice. Histologically, the grafted sinuses exhibited significant bone formation with integration of the bovine bone matrix particles to the new bone. Direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater for the delayed implant placement groups than for the implants installed simultaneously with the sinus augmentation. Furthermore, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater in the residual bone than in the augmented area. It was concluded that the anorganic bovine bone matrix facilitated bone formation and implant osseointegration in the augmented sinuses and that the delayed implant placement in combination with the sinus augmentation procedure seemed to be preferable.

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of porous hydroxyapatite (i.e. Interpore-200) as a bone grafting material for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male rhesus monkeys (i.e. Macaca mulatta) the 1st, 2nd and 3rd maxillary molars on one side of the jaws were extracted and the remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the bottom of the sinus was reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed on one side of the jaws in each monkey, and the sinuses grafted with the porous hydroxyapatite. Two IMZ titanium plasma-sprayed cylinder implants were then immediately placed into the augmented sinus (i.e. simultaneous implants-loaded group). After 4 months, 2 additional similar implants were placed into the previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed implants-loaded group). Four months later, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that the extractions were performed 7 months after those in the opposite side and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous implants-unloaded group and delayed implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded implants were stable at the day of sacrifice. Histologic analysis demonstrated a significant amount of new bone formation in the augmented sinuses. Porous hydroxyapatite graft particles appeared to be integrated to the new bone. The percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact in the augmented area was greater on the delayed-placed implants than on the simultaneously-placed implants. Also, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was greater in the residual bone than in the augmented area. It was concluded that this porous hydroxyapatite bone graft enhanced bone formation and bone-to-implant contact in the augmented sinuses and that the delayed implant placement in combination with the sinus augmentation procedure appears to result in a higher percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact.

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically, histologically and histometrically the use of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants in conjunction with maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. In 4 adult male Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) the 3 maxillary molars on 1 side of the jaws were extracted and the remaining bone between the alveolar crest and the floor of the sinus was reduced to 3-4 mm. After 3 months, maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed in each monkey and the sinuses were grafted with a porous hydroxyapatite bone graft (Interpore-200). At the same time, 2 hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants (IMZ) were immediately placed into the augmented sinuses (i.e. simultaneous-implants-loaded group). Four months later, 2 additional similar implants were placed into the previously augmented sinuses (i.e. delayed-implants-loaded group). After 4 months, the abutment connection was performed and all 4 implants were loaded with a gold-alloy bridge for 6 months (i.e. until sacrifice of the animals). The contralateral side of each monkey received the same treatment with the exception that removal of the maxillary molars was performed 7 months after those in the opposite side, and that the implants in this side were not loaded. Thus, 2 additional study groups (i.e. simultaneous-implants-unloaded group and delayed-implants-unloaded group) were obtained. Clinically, all loaded and unloaded implants were stable the day of sacrifice. Histologically, the grafted sinuses exhibited a significant amount of new bone formation with integration of the porous hydroxyapatite graft particles and hydroxyapatite-coat of the dental implants to the new bone. Histometric analysis indicated that on the loaded side the implants placed simultaneously with the sinus lift procedure exhibited greater direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact than the delayed placed implants. In addition, the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact was significantly greater in the residual bone in comparison to the augmented area in all groups. Loading of the implants exhibited a positive effect on the percentage of direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact in the augmented area. It could be concluded that hydroxyapatite-coated implants may be of benefit when used in conjunction with sinus augmentation procedures.