HILE THE PRINCIPLE THAT dying patients should be treated with respect and compassionisbroadlyaccepted among health care professionals, medical practices for end-of-life care differ around the world. In the United States, medicine has moved from a paternalistic model to one that promotes autonomy and self-determination. 1,2 Patient expectations and preferences now help shape end-of-life practices, limiting the use of technologies that may prolong dying rather than facilitate recovery. 1,2 In Europe, patient-physician relationships are still somewhat paternalistic. 3-5 Different cultures and countries deal in diverse ways with the ethical dilemmas arising as a consequence of the wider availability of life-sustaining therapies. 3,4,6 Some have not adopted the Western emphasis on patient autonomy or methods of terminating life support. 3,4,6 In the past, patients died in intensive care units (ICUs) despite ongoing aggressive therapy. 7 Theoretical discussions 7 and attitudes of critical care Author Affiliations and the members of the Ethicus Study Group are listed at the end of this article.

Rather than age or the severity of the illness and organ dysfunction, the strongest determinants of the withdrawal of ventilation in critically ill patients were the physician's perception that the patient preferred not to use life support, the physician's predictions of a low likelihood of survival in the intensive care unit and a high likelihood of poor cognitive function, and the use of inotropes or vasopressors.

Physician estimates of intensive care unit survival < 10% are associated with subsequent life support limitation and more powerfully predict intensive care unit mortality than illness severity, evolving or resolving organ dysfunction, and use of inotropes or vasopressors.