No abstract

The first part of this paper, dealing with the society of Ur during ED I-II according to the texts published by Burrows, was published in the Hrozn^ memorial number of Archiv Orientální 47 [1979]. Here I wish to follow the developments during the ED III period.That there was no other political authority at Ur during ED II except the temple seems to be suggested by another piece of evidence, admittedly very hypothetical. M. B. Rowton 1 explains the wrong sequence of rulers in the Nippur version of the Tummal chronicle by supposing that the author confounded Urlugal, son of Gilgames, with Lugal-ur-e, a ruler of the Second dynasty of Uruk, whose inscriptions might have been present in the Nippur temples. It is probable that such compilations as the Tummal chronicle were composed from copies of royal inscriptions placed in temples, copied by Mesopotamian scribes with reason-Able accuracy (e. g., the Nippur corpus of Akkadian inscriptions in Old Babylonian copies or the OB copy of the disc of Enheduanna inscription 2 ). IfRowton's suggestion is correct, it would mean that monuments of the six rulers in question were in accurate chronological sequence in the Ur temples in the time of compilation of the Ur version (Enmebaragesi-Aka, Gilgameâ-Urlugal, Mesannepada-Meskiagnunna). In the temples of Nippur, however, only monuments of Enmebaragesi-Aka, Mesannepada-Meskiagnunna and of Lugal-ur-e would have been present. This, in turn, would imply that while GilgameS did place some of his monuments in the Ur temples (possibly to win the support of Ur in his struggle against Kis), he did not do so at Nippur and he may even have attacked the holy -city (the first ruin of Tummal after Aka). With the support from the southern cities, Gilgameä might have felt stronger in his action against the north. However, quick response of Aka whose troops besieged Uruk effectively wrecked the whole scheme and forced Gilgames to give up his ambitious plans. Now all this is admittedly only guesswork. Yet, there is a piece of evidence which indicates that it should be given at least some consideration. During the excavation of the ED Ilia temple at el-Obeid rebuilt by Aanepada several older pieces came to light. Two of them deserve special interest. One is a badly damaged torso of a sculpture bearing an inscription of a man named KUR.LlL (other reading é-kur), chief of the granary at Uruk, who made (or had made) (the sculpture of?) the goddess Damgalnun. 3 Another piece is the statue of a man sitting cross-1 M.

No abstract

Článek představuje výzkumnou zprávu provede nou po první vlně epidemie Covid-19 na partnerských školách. Cílem tohoto výzkumu bylo pomocí dotazníku zjistit, zda a jakými prostředky se školám dařilo udržet kontakt se žáky. Jak vyplývá z uvedených dat, školám se nedařilo být v pravidelném kontaktu se žáky ze sociálně znevýhodněného prostředí, se žáky z ekonomicky slabých rodin a se žáky s nízkou motivací k učení, jejíž příčinou může být absence vzorů v rodinách, ekonomická situace a nevhodné prostředí pro školní přípravu. Klíčová slova: Covid-19, distanční výuka, žáci ve složitých podmínkách, komunikace s žáky, vzdělávání. III/2020Cooperation between schools and pupils living in diffi cult living conditions at the time of the measures implemented with the regard of spread of Covid-19

No abstract