Accumulating evidence supports a role of chemokines and their receptors in brain function. Up to now scarce evidence has been given of the neuroanatomical distribution of chemokine receptors. Although it is widely accepted that chemokine receptors are present on glial cells, especially in pathological conditions, it remains unclear whether they are constitutively present in normal rat brain and whether neurons have the potential to express such chemokine receptors. CXCR4, a G protein-coupled receptor for the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) was reported to have possible implications in brain development and AIDS-related dementia. By dual immunohistochemistry on brain sections, we clearly demonstrate that CXCR4 is constitutively expressed in adult rat brain, in glial cells (astrocytes, microglia but not oligodendrocytes) as well as in neurons. Neuronal expression of CXCR4 is mainly found in cerebral cortex, caudate putamen, globus pallidus, substantia innominata, supraoptic and paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei, ventromedial thalamic nucleus and substantia nigra. Using confocal microscopy, a differential distribution of CXCR4 in neuronal perikarya and dendrites can be observed according to the brain structure. Furthermore, this work demonstrates for the first time the coexistence of a chemokine receptor with classical neurotransmitters. A localization of CXCR4 is thus observed in neuronal cell bodies expressing choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactivity in the caudate putamen and substantia innominata, as well as in tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. In conclusion, the constitutive neuronal CXCR4 expression suggests that SDF-1/CXCL12 could be involved in neuronal communication and possibly linked up with cholinergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission and related disorders.

We demonstrate here that VP4, a rotaviral protein, is able to specifically bind to bundled actin microfilaments that are subsequently profoundly remodeled into actin bodies. These cytoplasmic actin bodies do not localize within identified intracellular compartments. VP4-induced actin remodeling is similar to cytochalasin D effects with kinetics compatible with that of rotavirus infection. Actin bundles' remodeling occurs both in infected and in VP4-transfected cells and in various cell lines, indicating that this is a general property of the viral protein itself. Interestingly, in intestinal epithelial cells, which represent the natural target of rotavirus, VP4 is addressed to the apical membrane where it binds specifically to brush border actin bundles and elicits its remodeling, whereas cytochalasin D impaired all the filamentous actin. These observations indicate that these original properties of VP4 likely explain the previously described brush border alterations that follow rotavirus infection of enterocytes and may also participate to the mechanism of rotavirus final assembly.

No abstract

Many strategies have been proposed to circumvent cancer development or prevent its growth. One of the promising strategies is to direct the immune response toward tumour antigens. This can be achieved by loading dendritic cells, the most potent antigen presenting cells, with tumour antigens. Fusion of dendritic cells (DC) with tumour cells is an attractive way to load the DC with all tumour antigens regardless of their immunogenicity status and the fact that they have, or not, been identified. The aim of our study was to characterise the immunophenotype of fused cells, monitor the evolution of the fusion interface and the distribution of surface antigens over time and assess for their maturation status and functionality in vitro. We used polyethylene glycol to fuse DC with Her2/neu positive breast cancer cell line T-47D. We demonstrate that false positive events accounted in flow cytometry can be identified using confocal microscopy to avoid an overestimation of fusion efficiency and to distinguish clearly hybrid cells from aggregated or phagocytosed cells. We used imaging means to demonstrate the conservation of presentation molecules (MHC II, CD1a), costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, CD86), as well as tumour antigens (Her2/neu, cytokeratins) in optimised conditions. Fused cells were only recognisable for 48 h as assessed by membrane staining and membranous antigen distribution. Fusion was necessary for their maturation to be accompanied by functional activity such as secretion of cytokines and perforin. These results suggest that hybrid cells generated by the fusion of DC and tumour cells can be easily identified and characterised using imaging techniques, and that, regarding functionality and cytokine secretion, they appear to be good candidates for anti-tumour therapies namely in breast cancer.

No abstract