In 1986, we initiated a multicenter, randomized trial to compare induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by locoregional treatment (surgery and radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone) with locoregional treatment alone in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Here we report the long-term results of the trial. A total of 237 patients with nonmetastatic stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment (group A) or locoregional treatment alone (group B). Among all patients, overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3% to 30.9%) and 19% (95% CI = 11.6% to 26.4%), respectively, for those in group A and 16% (95% CI = 9.6% to 23.4%) and 9% (95% CI = 3.5% to 14.7%), respectively, for those in group B (P = .13). Among operable patients, we observed no difference between group A and group B in overall survival at 5 and 10 years (group A, 31% [95% CI = 14.9% to 47.3%] and 22.7% [95% CI = 7.1% to 38.3%], respectively; group B, 43.3% [95% CI = 25.6% to 61.0%] and 14.2% [95% CI = 0.1% to 28.3%], respectively; P = .73). Among inoperable patients, overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 21% (95% CI = 12.3% to 30.1%) and 16% (95% CI = 7.7% to 23.9%), respectively, for group A and 8% (95% CI = 1.5% to 12.3%) and 6% (95% CI = 0.1% to 9.1%), respectively, for group B (log-rank P = .04). Four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising approach for treating patients with inoperable advanced head and neck cancer but not for treating patients with operable disease.
The clinical features and response to treatment of 35 patients (pts) with extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) were retrospectively analysed. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (28-72). Twenty-two pts (63%) had stage I disease (localized to the primary site) 12 of whom (34%) had stage I-E (locally extended). Three pts (9%) had stage II (regional lymph nodes involved) and 10 (29%) stage III (disseminated disease). In locoregional disease (stages I, I-E, II) complete local control was achieved in 22 of 25 pts (88%), while in diffuse disease (stage III) complete remission (CR) was obtained in 5 of 10 pts (50%) (p = 0.05). In 9 of 18 pts treated with surgery, local control was achieved, and in 8 of the 9 patients with incomplete resection local control was obtained with additional radiation and/or chemotherapy. In 8 (66%) of the 12 pts treated with radiation complete local control was achieved. In 11 (58%) of 19 pts evaluable for initial chemotherapy CR was obtained. Three of these pts were treated with chemotherapy only and were alive and disease-free after a minimum follow-up of 8 years. The median time to relapse in local disease was 48 months versus 13 in disseminated disease. For pts with local disease the median survival time was 114 months and for disseminated disease 16 months (p = 0.0000). We conclude that in stage I chemotherapy is curative per se. In local stages (I, I-E and II) adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered, while in stage III only palliative therapy is feasible.
Radiation retinopathy is a complication of the therapeutic irradiation of orbital and periorbital structures. The authors studied two groups of patients who had orbital (group 1) and periorbital (group 2) external irradiation. Radiation retinopathy occurred in 63.6% of patients in group 1 and 36.3% group 2. Retinal radiation damage showed a different clinical evaluation in the two groups, appearing earlier (mean, 11 versus 55 months) and with greater involvement of the peripheral retina in group 1 (with three cases of neovascular glaucoma). This study demonstrates that radiation retinopathy occurs in a significant number of cases when the eye is not totally involved in the irradiation field and shows at least two different clinical aspects in relation to the radiation treatment. It also suggests that portal design and choroidal circulation damage may represent important factors in the development of radiation retinopathy
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.