Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable, and arguable lines of evidence, including modeling approaches, theoretical considerations, and observations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol-radiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol-driven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed-phase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of -1.6 to -0.6 W m −2 , or -2.0 to -0.4 W m −2 with a 90% likelihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment but shifted toward more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial-era changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds. Plain Language SummaryHuman activities emit into the atmosphere small liquid and solid particles called aerosols. Those aerosols change the energy budget of the Earth and trigger climate changes, by scattering and absorbing solar and terrestrial radiation and playing important roles in the formation of
Aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) remains one of the most uncertain components of the present-day climate . Uncertainty in present-day forcing reduces our ability to confidently predict the future climate response to emissions (Forster et al., 2013) and the level of historical greenhouse gas warming masked by the cooling effect of aerosols (Samset et al., 2018). Aerosol forcing is the largest uncertainty governing future committed warming (Matthews & Zickfeld, 2012;Smith et al., 2019) and remaining carbon budgets consistent with Paris Agreement targets (Mengis & Matthews, 2020). In most future socio-economic scenarios, aerosol forcing is projected to become less negative over the 21st century (Gidden et al., 2019;Huppmann et al., 2018;Rogelj et al., 2018), promoting an increase in the rate of warming unless there is a concurrent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (Shindell & Smith, 2019). The time history of aerosol ERF is a necessary input to many reduced-complexity climate models (Nicholls et al., 2020), which
Observed instantaneous radiative forcing has increased, strengthening the top-ofatmosphere radiative imbalance.• Due to cancellations in longwave and shortwave radiation, the sum of rapid adjustments and radiative feedbacks exhibit an insignificant trend.• Observed increases in instantaneous radiative forcing are direct evidence of the anthropogenic effects on the Earth's radiative energy budget.
Aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) remains one of the most uncertain components of the present-day climate . Uncertainty in present-day forcing reduces our ability to confidently predict the future climate response to emissions (Forster et al., 2013) and the level of historical greenhouse gas warming masked by the cooling effect of aerosols (Samset et al., 2018). Aerosol forcing is the largest uncertainty governing future committed warming (Matthews & Zickfeld, 2012;Smith et al., 2019) and remaining carbon budgets consistent with Paris Agreement targets (Mengis & Matthews, 2020). In most future socio-economic scenarios, aerosol forcing is projected to become less negative over the 21st century (Gidden et al., 2019;Huppmann et al., 2018;Rogelj et al., 2018), promoting an increase in the rate of warming unless there is a concurrent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (Shindell & Smith, 2019). The time history of aerosol ERF is a necessary input to many reduced-complexity climate models (Nicholls et al., 2020), which
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.