The sensitivities of the assays were evaluated using sera from 90 patients with parasitologically proven intestinal strongyloidiasis and from 9 patients with clinical larva currens. The sensitivities of the AMC-ELISA, dipstick assay, IVD-ELISA, and Bordier-ELISA were 93, 91, 89, and 83%, respectively, for intestinal strongyloidiasis. In all tests, eight of nine sera from patients with larva currens were positive. The specificity was assessed using a large serum bank of 220 sera from patients with various parasitic, bacterial, viral, and fungal infectious diseases; sera containing autoimmune antibodies; and sera from healthy blood donors. The specificities of AMC-ELISA, dipstick assay, IVD-ELISA, and Bordier-ELISA were 95.0, 97.7, 97.2, and 97.2%, respectively. Our data suggest that all four assays are sensitive and specific tests for the diagnosis of both intestinal and cutaneous strongyloidiasis.
We describe a PCR-confirmed case of Plasmodium knowlesi infection with a high parasitemia level and clinical signs of severe malaria in a migrant worker from Malaysian Borneo in the Netherlands. Investigations showed that commercially available rapid antigen tests for detection of human Plasmodium infections can detect P. knowlesi infections in humans.
Aseptic abscesses (AA) are characterized by deep, sterile, round lesions consisting of neutrophil that do not respond to antibiotics but improve dramatically with corticosteroids. We report the clinical, laboratory, and radiologic characteristics and the associated conditions of 29 patients from the French Register on AA plus 1 patient from the Netherlands.The mean age of patients at AA diagnosis was 29 years (SD = 14). The main clinical manifestations of AA were fever (90%), abdominal pain (67%), and weight loss (50%). Duration of symptoms was 4.7 months on average until abscesses were discovered. The abscesses involved the spleen in 27/29 patients (93%; the thirtieth patient had a personal history of splenectomy after a trauma). In 7 they were unifocal and in the others they were multifocal, involving in addition the abdominal lymph nodes in 14 (48%), liver in 12 (40%), lung in 5 (17%), pancreas in 2 (7%), and brain in 2 (7%). They were not splenic in 3, including 2 with abdominal lymph nodes and 1 with superficial lymph nodes and testicle and lung involvement. Twenty-two patients (70%) had elevated white blood cell and neutrophil count; antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies with a perinuclear, cytoplasmic or atypical pattern (negative for antiproteinase 3 and negative for antimyeloperoxidase except for 1) were positive in 21% of the 24 patients tested. Twenty-one patients had inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which preceded the occurrence of abscesses in 7, was concomitant in 7, and appeared secondarily in 7. Six patients had neutrophilic dermatosis (20%), 3 had relapsing polychondritis as an associated condition, and 3 others had monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Three patients had no associated condition. Splenectomy was performed in 15 (52%) patients. All patients received steroid therapy. Thirteen (43%) were given additional immunosuppressive therapy, 1 immediately and the others after a relapse, of whom 3 were also treated by anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents. Mean follow-up was 7 years. Eighteen (60%) patients experienced 1 or several relapses, but there was no death related to AA. Relapses occurred on immunosuppressive therapy in 2 patients and off immunosuppressive therapy in the others while corticosteroids were being tapered. We surveyed the literature and analyzed 19 additional cases. AA is an emergent and probably underrecognized entity. It represents an apparently noninfectious inflammatory disorder involving neutrophils that responds to corticosteroid therapy. AA mainly affects patients with IBD but also affects those with other conditions, or with no other apparent disease.
Background Few studies have evaluated patients’ perceived burden of cancer surveillance tests. Cancer screening and surveillance, however, require a large number of patients to undergo potentially burdensome tests with only some experiencing health gains from it. We investigated the determinants of patients’ reported burden of upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy by comparing data from three patient groups. Patients and methods A total of 476 patients were included: 180 patients under regular surveillance for Barrett esophagus (BE), a premalignant disorder; 214 patients with non-specific upper GI symptoms (NS), and 82 patients recently diagnosed with upper GI cancer (CA). We assessed pain, discomfort and overall burden experienced during endoscopy, symptoms in the week afterwards and psychological distress over time (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and Impact of Event Scale). Results Two-thirds (66%) of patients reported discomfort and overall burden of upper GI endoscopy. Only 23% reported any pain. BE patients reported significantly less discomfort, pain and overall burden than the other patients: those with NS reported more discomfort, CA patients more pain, and both more overall burden. These differences could be statistically explained by the number of previous endoscopies and whether sedation was provided or not, but not by patient characteristics. Conclusion The perception of upper GI endoscopy varies by patient group, due to potential adaptation after multiple endoscopies and aspects of the procedure.
No case fatalities were observed in the ET group. The complications that were observed with ET were more likely related either to the multiorgan dysfunction associated with severe malaria or to side effects of parenteral quinine rather than to the ET procedure. ET may be safely executed in a setting with intensive care facilities and availability of safe blood products and should be considered as a beneficial adjunct treatment to parenteral antimalarial therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.