We describe how hard-of-hearing (HOH) employees renegotiate both their existing and new group memberships when they acquire and begin to use hearing aids (HAs). Our research setting was longitudinal and we carried out a theory-informed qualitative analysis of multiple qualitative data. When an individual discovers that they have a hearing problem and acquire a HA, their group memberships undergo change. First, HOH employees need to start negotiating their relationship with the HOH group. Second, they need to consider whether they see themselves as members of the disabled or the nondisabled employee group. This negotiation tends to be context-bound, situational, and nonlinear as a process, involving a back-and-forth movement in the way in which HOH employees value different group memberships. The dilemmatic negotiation of new group memberships and the other social aspects involved in HA rehabilitation tend to remain invisible to rehabilitation professionals, occupational healthcare, and employers.
Between the years 1996 and 2000, over 2000 projects were carried out in Finland with the aim of finding innovative measures for crossing the job threshold. Among them was the Pathway-to-Work Project, which aimed at tailoring return-to-work plans for 140 middle-aged, long-term unemployed participants with various disabilities and getting half of them into work or training. This study of the Pathway-to-Work Project had two research objectives. First, to evaluate the outcomes of the return-to-work rehabilitation project and second, to determine what combination of different measures seemed necessary and effective in the rehabilitation of long-term unemployed people with disabilities. The research design comprised three parts: a quantitative quasi-experimental part with a matched control group, a register follow-up and the collection of qualitative data. The main variables used to evaluate the outcomes were (1) the changes in the labour market situation during the 2-year register follow-up, (2) the changes in distress (measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12), perceived competence (measured by Wallston's Self-Performance Survey) and sense of coherence (measured by Antonovsky's SOC-13) during the intervention and (3) the description of the process in the project. In the 1-year follow-up, 31% of the participants were found to be at work and 37% unemployed. In the 2-year follow-up, 14% were at work and 59% unemployed. The jobs seemed to be subsidized for a period of half a year to a year. The difference between the project group and the matched control group was remarkable: at the end of the project, only 9% of the control group were at work and 86% unemployed. The participants' distress level decreased remarkably and their perceived competence increased, but their sense of coherence did not change. The results showed that even carefully tailored client work enables only some of the long-term unemployed people with disabilities to cross the job threshold and that other means of policy, strategy and intervention are needed to link the return-to-work interventions more closely with work, work places and enterprises.
IntroductionThe sustainable employment outcomes and cost-effectiveness of Supported Employment (SE) and Individual Placement and Support (IPS) have been well reported. Research has also focused on various target groups, compliance with the quality criteria for the implementation of the SE/IPS method in diverse work life and social security contexts. However, the impact of employers’ interests and the quality and opportunities of jobs or the work itself for sustainable working careers have not been studied extensively. The objective of the proposed scoping review is to systematically explore what is known about sustainable employability in SE and IPS interventions in the context of the characteristics of work and perspectives of the employers.Methods and analysesThe scoping review methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley and its recently enhanced versions are used as guidelines in this study. The literature search, which was conducted in Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Social Science Premium Collection (ProQuest), identified a total of 2706 articles after the removal of duplicates. Key findings of selected studies will be charted, analysed and reported.Ethics and disseminationThe study does not require ethics approval, as the data are collected from secondary sources. The final version of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal. Findings of the review will be used in the upcoming ethnographic observation at work study, which is part of the Finnish Work Ability Programme Evaluation Study (2020–2023).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.