BACKGROUND: This initiative sought to improve nutrition delivery in critically ill children with heart disease admitted to the cardiac ICU (CICU) and neonates undergoing stage 1 palliation (S1P) for single-ventricle physiology through interdisciplinary team interventions. Specific goals were increased caloric and protein delivery for all patients and a more nourished state for infants with single ventricles at the time of discharge.

Objective: A standardised multi-site approach to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax does not exist and leads to unnecessary practice variation. The Chylothorax Work Group utilised the Pediatric Critical Care Consortium infrastructure to address this gap. Methods: Over 60 multi-disciplinary providers representing 22 centres convened virtually as a quality initiative to develop an algorithm to manage paediatric post-operative chylothorax. Agreement was objectively quantified for each recommendation in the algorithm by utilising an anonymous survey. “Consensus” was defined as ≥ 80% of responses as “agree” or “strongly agree” to a recommendation. In order to determine if the algorithm recommendations would be correctly interpreted in the clinical environment, we developed ex vivo simulations and surveyed patients who developed the algorithm and patients who did not. Results: The algorithm is intended for all children (<18 years of age) within 30 days of cardiac surgery. It contains rationale for 11 central chylothorax management recommendations; diagnostic criteria and evaluation, trial of fat-modified diet, stratification by volume of daily output, timing of first-line medical therapy for “low” and “high” volume patients, and timing and duration of fat-modified diet. All recommendations achieved “consensus” (agreement >80%) by the workgroup (range 81–100%). Ex vivo simulations demonstrated good understanding by developers (range 94–100%) and non-developers (73%–100%). Conclusions: The quality improvement effort represents the first multi-site algorithm for the management of paediatric post-operative chylothorax. The algorithm includes transparent and objective measures of agreement and understanding. Agreement to the algorithm recommendations was >80%, and overall understanding was 94%.

Introduction:Variable compliance to postoperative feeding algorithms after pediatric cardiac surgery may be associated with suboptimal growth, decreased parental satisfaction, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). Our heart center performed an audit of compliance to a previously introduced postoperative feeding algorithm to guide quality improvement efforts. We hypothesized that algorithm noncompliance would be associated with increased LOS.Methods:We retrospectively identified children ≤ 3 months admitted for their first cardiac surgery between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. The algorithm uses objective oral feeding readiness assessments (FRA). At the end of a predefined evaluation period, a “sentinel” FRA score is assigned. The sentinel FRA and FRA trend guide decisions to pursue gastrostomy tube (GT) or oral-only feeds. Among those who reached the sentinel FRA, we defined compliance as ≤ 3 days before pursuing GT or oral-only feeds once indicated by the algorithm.Results:Sixty-nine patients were included. Forty-nine complied with the algorithm (71%), and 45 received GT (65.2%). Noncompliers had significantly longer LOS (34 versus 25 days; P = 0.01). Among GT recipients, noncompliers waited 6 additional days for a GT compared with compliers (P ≤ 0.001). Subjective decisions to extend oral feeding trials or await results of a swallow study were associated with algorithm noncompliance.Conclusions:This audit of compliance to a feeding algorithm after pediatric cardiac surgery highlighted variability of practice, including relying on subjective appraisals of feeding skills over objective FRAs. This variability was associated with increased LOS and can be hypothesis-generating for future quality improvement efforts.

In this analysis, systematic and standardized measurements of feeding readiness employed immediately before and one week after congenital cardiac surgery predicted need for GT placement prior to hospital discharge. The FRA score may be used to risk stratify patients based on likelihood of prolonged feeding difficulties, which may further improve standardization of care.

Introduction: Chylothorax after congenital cardiac surgery is associated with increased risk of malnutrition. Nutritional management following chylothorax diagnosis varies across sites and patient populations, and a standardised approach has not been disseminated. The aim of this review article is to provide contemporary recommendations related to nutritional management of chylothorax to minimise risk of malnutrition. Methods: The management guidelines were developed by consensus across four dietitians, one nurse practitioner, and two physicians with a cumulative 52 years of experience caring for children with CHD. A PubMed database search for relevant literature included the terms chylothorax, paediatric, postoperative, CHD, chylothorax management, growth failure, and malnutrition. Results: Fat-modified diets and nil per os therapies for all paediatric patients (<18 years of age) following cardiac surgery are highlighted in this review. Specific emphasis on strategies for treatment, duration of therapies, optimisation of nutrition including nutrition-focused lab monitoring, and supplementation strategies are provided. Conclusions: Our deliverable is a clinically useful guide for the nutritional management of chylothorax following paediatric cardiac surgery.