Introduction:Variable compliance to postoperative feeding algorithms after pediatric cardiac surgery may be associated with suboptimal growth, decreased parental satisfaction, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). Our heart center performed an audit of compliance to a previously introduced postoperative feeding algorithm to guide quality improvement efforts. We hypothesized that algorithm noncompliance would be associated with increased LOS.Methods:We retrospectively identified children ≤ 3 months admitted for their first cardiac surgery between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. The algorithm uses objective oral feeding readiness assessments (FRA). At the end of a predefined evaluation period, a “sentinel” FRA score is assigned. The sentinel FRA and FRA trend guide decisions to pursue gastrostomy tube (GT) or oral-only feeds. Among those who reached the sentinel FRA, we defined compliance as ≤ 3 days before pursuing GT or oral-only feeds once indicated by the algorithm.Results:Sixty-nine patients were included. Forty-nine complied with the algorithm (71%), and 45 received GT (65.2%). Noncompliers had significantly longer LOS (34 versus 25 days; P = 0.01). Among GT recipients, noncompliers waited 6 additional days for a GT compared with compliers (P ≤ 0.001). Subjective decisions to extend oral feeding trials or await results of a swallow study were associated with algorithm noncompliance.Conclusions:This audit of compliance to a feeding algorithm after pediatric cardiac surgery highlighted variability of practice, including relying on subjective appraisals of feeding skills over objective FRAs. This variability was associated with increased LOS and can be hypothesis-generating for future quality improvement efforts.

In this analysis, systematic and standardized measurements of feeding readiness employed immediately before and one week after congenital cardiac surgery predicted need for GT placement prior to hospital discharge. The FRA score may be used to risk stratify patients based on likelihood of prolonged feeding difficulties, which may further improve standardization of care.

Feeding disorders and gastrostomy use are highly prevalent in children with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) due to both common risk factors (eg, prematurity, neurological disorders) and resultant experiential deprivation (eg, long hospitalizations, delayed feeding experiences). Feeding in children with IMV is complicated by the presence of a tracheostomy, lung vulnerability, and medical complexity. The potential comorbidity of swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) and atypical early feeding experiences can result in complex feeding disorders. In this review of pediatric feeding disorders in children with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), we identify gaps in clinical translational research for this patient population and opportunities for improving evidence-based management. To improve long-term feeding outcomes and maximize oral feeding in this vulnerable population, children would benefit from earlier feeding opportunities during critical developmental windows, standardized protocols for advancing oral feeding, and involvement of intensive, comprehensive therapies throughout hospitalizations and early childhood. [ Pediatr Ann . 2022;51(7):e291–e296.]

No abstract