Grapevine virus H (GVH) is a member of the genus Vitivirus in the family Betaflexiviridae (subfamily Trivirinae, order Tymovirales) that infects grapevine (Candresse et al., 2018). GVH was first identified in a symptomless grapevine of an unknown cultivar from Portugal in 2018 (Candresse et al. 2018), and since then the virus has been reported only from California (Diaz‑Lara et al. 2019). Several vitiviruses have been detected in Greek vineyards (Avgelis and Roubos 2000; Dovas and Katis 2003a; 2003b; Panailidou et al. 2019; Lotos et al. 2020), but no information was available on the presence of GVH. In the fall of 2020, in order to investigate the virome of a commercial vineyard of the cultivar Assyrtiko in northern Greece, a composite sample was made of leaves and petioles from nine vines exhibiting leafroll disease symptoms. Total RNA was extracted from the composite sample according to the protocol of White et al. (2008) and subjected to rRNA depletion, library construction (TruSeq Stranded Total RNA kit), and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) in a NovaSeq6000 platform (Illumina Inc.) at Macrogen (Korea). The resulting ~42 million 101-nt paired-end reads were analyzed in Geneious Prime 2020, and the assembled de novo contigs were subjected to a local BLASTn search, which revealed the presence of 18 grapevine infecting viruses and viroids, among which also a GVH-like contig (GeA-9). GeA-9 was 7,404 nucleotides (nt) long, covering 99.4% of the full virus genome and shared 98.2 % nt identity with a GVH isolate from the USA (MN716768). To confirm the presence of GVH, the nine samples of the cultivar Assyrtiko, used initially to produce the composite sample for HTS analysis, were tested individually by RT-PCR, using the primers GVH_F_2504 (5’-CTGCTTCGCTGAACATATGC-3’) and GVH_R_2835 (5’-ATCATTRTGATCGAGAGAGTAGTG-3’) that amplify a 331-nt segment of ORF1. GVH was detected in five out of the nine tested samples and one of these was reamplified and subjected to Sanger sequencing. The fragment of ORF1 obtained by Sanger sequencing (MW460005) was 97.5% identical to the nucleotide sequence of the corresponding GVH-like de novo contig (GeA-9) from HTS analysis and it shared 97.2% nt identity with GVH sequences reported from Portugal and USA, respectively (NC_040545 and MN716768), confirming the presence of GVH in the tested samples. This is the first report of GVH in grapevine in Greece, thus further increasing the number of vitiviruses known to infect Greek vineyards and also expanding the number of geographic locations in which GVH is recorded so far.

No abstract

No abstract

Rugose wood is one of the most important disease syndromes of grapevine and it has been associated with at least three viruses: grapevine rupestris stem pitting associated virus (GRSPaV), grapevine virus A (GVA) and grapevine virus B (GVB). All three viruses show a worldwide distribution pattern, and their genetic composition has been the focus of extensive research over the past years. Despite their first record in Greece almost 20 years ago, there is a lack of knowledge on the distribution and genetic variability of their populations in Greek vineyards. In this context, we investigated the distribution of GRSPaV, GVA and GVB in rootstocks, self-rooted and grafted grapevine cultivars, originating from different geographic regions that are representing important viticultural areas of Greece. Three new RT-PCR assays were developed for the reliable detection of GRSPaV, GVA and GVB. Our results indicated that GVA is the most prevalent in Greek vineyards, followed by GRSPaV and GVB. However, virus incidence differed among self-rooted and grafted grapevine cultivars or rootstocks tested. Selected isolates from each virus were further molecularly characterized to determine their phylogenetic relationships. All three viruses exhibited high nucleotide diversity, which was depicted in the constructed phylogenetic trees. Isolates from Greece were placed in various phylogroups, reinforcing the scenario of multiple introductions of GVA, GVB and GRSPaV in Greece and highlighting the effect of different transmission modes in the evolutionary course of the three viruses.

No abstract