Skeletal muscle protein loss occurs during marrow transplantation despite total parenteral nutrition. To determine if muscle atrophy could be minimized with exercise therapy, 30 patients undergoing marrow transplantation for acute leukemia completed a prospective randomized trial to receive: (1) no therapy (controls), (2) physical therapy thrice weekly (PT3), or (3) physical therapy five times weekly (PT5). Patients were studied through 35 days posttransplant. Muscle protein status and turnover was assessed by weekly nitrogen balance, and creatinine and 3-methylhistidine excretion. Results favored a muscle protein-sparing effect of exercise, as a significant decrease in creatinine excretion in controls only suggested muscle protein loss associated with inactivity. Changes in arm muscle area correlated with energy, but not protein intake. Large individual variation, inadequate nutritional support and differences in admission arm muscle area may have clouded these results.

There have been many changes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that affect the patient's nutrition support. In the early 1970s, allogeneic transplants were the most common types of HSCTs; today, autologous transplants are the most common. Bone marrow, peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood all now serve as sources of stem cells. Conditioning therapies include myeloablative, reduced-intensity myeloablative, and nonmyeloablative regimens. New medications are being developed and used to minimize the toxicities of the conditioning therapy and to minimize infectious complications. Supportive therapies for renal and liver complications have changed. In the past, HSCT patients received parenteral nutrition (PN) throughout their hospitalization and sometimes as home therapy. Because of medical complications and cost issues associated with PN, many centers are now working to use less PN and increase use of enteral nutrition. The immunosuppressed diet has changed from a sterile diet prepared under laminar-flow hoods to a more liberal diet that avoids high-risk foods and emphasizes safety in food handling practices. This article will review these changes in HSCT and the impact of these changes on the nutrition support of the patient.

Experimental data have implicated intravenous lipids as being immunosuppressive, yet evidence that lipids are associated with an increase in clinically documented infections is sparse. A prospective trial conducted in patients with hematologic malignancies who were undergoing bone marrow transplantation compared the incidence of bacteremia and fungemia during the first month after the transplant. Patients (n = 512) were randomly assigned to receive 6-8% (low dose) or 25-30% (standard dose) of total daily energy as a 20% lipid emulsion. An adaptive randomization scheme stratified for treatments that might influence infection outcome (hematopoietic growth factors, fluconazole, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with steroids, pentoxifylline, intravenous immunoglobulin, and total body irradiation). The transplant type (autologous, related family donor, or unrelated donor) did not differ in distribution between treatment groups. Of the evaluable patients (n = 482), 55 patients in the standard-dose lipid group developed bacteremia or fungemia compared with 54 in the low-dose lipid group. The log-rank test comparing the time to first infection found no association between the incidence of bacteremia or fungemia and intravenous lipid (P = 0.95). Similar results were found when analyzed as intent-to-treat (P = 0.98), when bacterial or fungal infections at all sites were included (P = 0.94), and when the observation period was extended to 60 d (P = 0.58 for blood infections, P = 0.77 for infections at all sites). These data indicate that moderate amounts of intravenous lipid rich in linoleic acid are not associated with an increased incidence of bacterial or fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation and receiving total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:927-33.