• Over 30% of patients with unexplained cytopenias who do not meet diagnostic criteria for MDS carry MDS-associated somatic mutations.• Clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance are more common than MDS and show comparable variant allele frequencies and blood counts.Establishing a diagnosis in patients suspected of having a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) can be challenging and could be informed by the identification of somatic mutations. We performed a prospective study to examine the frequency and types of mutations encountered in 144 patients with unexplained cytopenias. Based on bone marrow findings, 17% were diagnosed with MDS, 15% with idiopathic cytopenias of undetermined significance (ICUS) and some evidence of dysplasia, and 69% with ICUS and no dysplasia. Bone marrow DNA was sequenced for mutations in 22 frequently mutated myeloid malignancy genes. Somatic mutations were identified in 71% of MDS patients, 62% of patients with ICUS and some dysplasia, and 20% of ICUS patients and no dysplasia. In total, 35% of ICUS patients carried a somatic mutation or chromosomal abnormality indicative of clonal hematopoiesis. We validated these results in a cohort of 91 lower-risk MDS and 249 ICUS cases identified over a 6-month interval. Mutations were found in 79% of those with MDS, in 45% of those with ICUS with dysplasia, and in 17% of those with ICUS without dysplasia. The spectrum of mutated genes was similar with the exception of SF3B1 which was rarely mutated in patients without dysplasia. Variant allele fractions were comparable between clonal ICUS (CCUS) and MDS as were mean age and blood counts. We demonstrate that CCUS is a more frequent diagnosis than MDS in cytopenic patients. Clinical and mutational features are similar in these groups and may have diagnostic utility once outcomes in CCUS patients are better understood. (Blood. 2015;126(21):2355-2361 IntroductionMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal bone marrow disorders characterized by inefficient and dysmorphic hematopoietic differentiation, cytopenias of the peripheral blood, and increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 Establishing a diagnosis of MDS in a cytopenic patient is often challenging as the bone marrow must demonstrate dysplasia in 10% or more of a myeloid cell lineage or a blast proportion of 5% or greater.2 Quantification of these features can be subjective and prone to wide interobserver variation even among expert hematopathologists. 3,4 In cases that do not meet either bone marrow criteria, the presence of certain clonal karyotype abnormalities typical for MDS can serve as presumptive evidence of the diagnosis.2 Finally, other neoplasms and nonclonal causes of cytopenias must also be reasonably excluded. Many patients with otherwise unexplained cytopenias will fail to meet the diagnostic criteria for MDS and instead carry a designation of idiopathic cytopenias of undetermined significance (ICUS). 5-7The natural history of patients with ICUS is largely unknown and appears to be highly variable. Sma...

Cancer research has previously focused on the identification of specific genes and pathways responsible for cancer initiation and progression based on the prevailing viewpoint that cancer is caused by a stepwise accumulation of genetic aberrations. This viewpoint, however, is not consistent with the clinical finding that tumors display high levels of genetic heterogeneity and distinctive karyotypes. We show that chromosomal instability primarily generates stochastic karyotypic changes leading to the random progression of cancer. This was accomplished by tracing karyotypic patterns of individual cells that contained either defective genes responsible for genome integrity or were challenged by onco-proteins or carcinogens that destabilized the genome. Analysis included the tracing of patterns of karyotypic evolution during different stages of cellular immortalization. This study revealed that non-clonal chromosomal aberrations (NCCAs) (both aneuploidy and structural aberrations) and not recurrent clonal chromosomal aberrations (CCAs) are directly linked to genomic instability and karyotypic evolution. Discovery of "transitional CCAs" during in vitro immortalization clearly demonstrates that karyotypic evolution in solid tumors is not a continuous process. NCCAs and their dynamic interplay with CCAs create infinite genomic combinations leading to clonal diversity necessary for cancer cell evolution. The karyotypic chaos observed within the cell crisis stage prior to establishment of the immortalization further supports the ultimate importance of genetic aberrations at the karyotypic or genome level. Therefore, genomic instability generated NCCAs are a key driving force in cancer progression. The dynamic relationship between NCCAs and CCAs provides a mechanism underlying chromosomal based cancer evolution and could have broad clinical applications.

No abstract

Calmodulin (CaM) has been reported to have affinity for the estrogen receptor (ER). Observations reported here reveal a direct physical interaction between purified CaM and ER. This direct ER-CaM interaction may be an initial event preceding the assembly of ER plus auxiliary proteins into the active ER complex with its DNA motif, the estrogen response element. We demonstrate that CaM is an integral component of this complex by using a system reconstituted from purified ER and nuclear extract from ER-negative breast cancer cells and also with ER-depleted nuclear extract of an ER-positive breast cancer cell line. Although CaM is essential for formation of this complex, it is not sufficient, suggesting roles also of auxiliary proteins. CaM also is functionally required for activation of an ER-responsive promoter, in the 17␤-estradiol-ER pathway of hormone action and regulation of 17␤-estradiol-responsive gene expression that is associated with proliferation of mammary epithelial cells. CaM1 plays a pivotal role in the proliferation of a variety of cells. Several observations indicate CaM involvement in estrogen regulation of breast cancer cell growth. Calcium homeostasis is lost (1), and expression of calcium binding proteins is modulated (2-4). There is an overall increase of Ca 2ϩ levels in human mammary tumors (5, 6), and CaM concentrations are 2-3-fold higher in estrogen receptor-positive (ERϩ) than in estrogen receptor-negative (ERϪ) breast tumors (7). The growth of breast cancer cells is highly sensitive to anti-calmodulin drugs (8, 9), and the anti-estrogen Tamoxifen binds to CaM with high affinity and antagonizes its action (10). CaM also modulates estrogen (17␤-estradiol (E2)) binding to ER (11), and synergistic inhibition of growth by CaM inhibitors and antiestrogens (12, 13) are associated with breast cancer.Both anti-estrogens and anti-calmodulin drugs block breast cancer cells at an identical point in the G 1 phase of the cell cycle (14). Furthermore, CaM is known to stimulate the phosphorylation of estrogen receptors (15). Biochemical evidence suggests an interaction of CaM with ER (11, 16 -19), but these results did not demonstrate a direct physical contact.We examined more directly the possibility of a role of CaM in key downstream events of E2 action, i.e. the interaction of ER protein with its cognate DNA sequence (estrogen response element (ERE)) to form the ER⅐ERE complex and the resulting transactivation of an E2-responsive promoter. We observed that CaM directly interacts with ER, and is not only an integral component of the ER⅐ERE complex but also plays an essential role in complex formation. Its functional involvement in the molecular pathway of E2-induced transactivation of hormoneresponsive genes in breast cancers was tested. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESCell Lines and Culture-MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were obtained from ATCC and were grown in rich medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2.8 M hydrocortisone, 1 g/ml insulin, and 12.5 ng/ml epide...

Prostate cancer may originate from distinct cell types, resulting in the heterogeneity of this disease. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and androgen receptor (AR) have been reported to play important roles in the progression of prostate cancer, and their heterogeneous expressions might be associated with different cancer subtypes. Our study found that in various prostate cancer cell lines Gal-3 expression was always opposite to AR expression and other luminal cell markers but consistent with basal cell markers including glutathione S-transferase-π and Bcl-2. This expression pattern was confirmed in human prostate cancer tissues. Our results also showed that prostate cancer cells positive with basal cell markers were more aggressive. Downregulation of Gal-3 expression resulted in increased apoptotic potential and decreased metastasis potential of prostate cancer cells. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that Gal-3 may serve as a new marker for basal characteristics of prostate cancer epithelium. This study helps us to better understand the heterogeneity of prostate cancer. The clinical significance of this study lies in the application of Gal-3 to distinguish prostate cancer subtypes and improve treatment efficacy with designed personalized therapy.