This study aims to provide empirical evidence about the effect of tax avoidance on firm value is moderated by corporate governance and majority shareholder. This study using a sample of 13 non-financial companies that listed on Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) ranking list. This research uses 3 hypotheses. data were analyzed using multiple linear regression using SPSS 22.0 program. The results showed that tax avoidance has no significant effect on firm value, corporate governance that moderates tax avoidance affects the firm's value and the majority shareholder that moderates tax avoidance does not affect the firm's value.

This study aims to provide empirical evidence that there is an influence of foreign ownership structure and the foreign board of commissioner against tax avoidance. In addition, the study Also tested based on tax avoidance tax incentives and non-tax incentives. The dependent variable in this study is tax avoidance is measured using five proxies items, namely the effective tax rate (ETR), cash effective tax rate (CETR), the book-tax difference (BTD), tax expenses to operating cash flow (TEOCF), and Tax Paid to Operating Cash Flow (TPOCF). The independent variables are foreign ownership structure, the foreign board of commissioner, tax incentives (profitability) and non-tax incentives (leverage and firm size). The theory tested in this research is the legitimacy theory. The sample of this research is the non-financial sector 53 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2012 to 2016. Data collection method using a purposive sampling technique.The method of analysis in this study using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that the structure of foreign ownership effect on tax avoidance through proxy ETR and CETR. The Board of Commissioners has an effect on tax avoidance through the proxy of TEOCF and TPOCF. Profitability has an effect on tax avoidance through proxy CETR, TEOCF, and TPOCF. Leverage Affects tax avoidance through proxy ETR, TEOCF, BTD, and TPOCF. Company size has no effect on tax avoidance. The results of this study will be useful for Academics to PROVE that foreign ownership structures and the foreign board of Commissioners are Able to limit tax avoidance measures, investors in decision-making, regulators in regards to the presence of the foreign board of Commissioners, as well as Researchers for future reference.

The  focus  of  this  study  aimed  to  analyze  the  influence  of  financial  ratios  to  future earnings growth consist of  CAR, KAP, PPAP, NIM, ROA, ROA, and LDR. The sample in this research is the state-owned banking company listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange which issued  quarterly  and  annual  financial statements  for  fiscal  year  2009  to 2013,  namely  PT. Bank  Mandiri  (Persero),  Tbk,  PT.  Bank  Rakyat  Indonesia  (Persero),  Tbk,  and  PT.  Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. These three state-owned banks are located in the category of Commercial Bank Business Activities (BUKU) 4 with core capital above Rp. 30 trillion. Data collection methods used are literature and documentation. Data were analyzed using classic  assumption  test,  multiple  linear  regression  analysis  test,  and  test  the  hypothesis  by using the tool SPSS. This study could not provide the empirical evidence on the influence of CAR, KAP, PPAP, NIM, BOPO, ROA, dan LDR to earning growth.

Purpose : This study aimed to prove whether audit committees were proxied financial expertise and meetings related to fraudulent financial reporting. Research methodology: This type of research was quantitative descriptive with an evaluation model of Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score in predicting fraudulent financial reporting. The sample in this study was non-financial companies listed on the Stock Exchange with an observation period of 2010-2018. The technique of taking samples with purposive sampling obtained the number of observations 551. Data processing was done via SPSS through logistic regression. Results : The results of the study showed that the characteristic of the audit committee that influence the fraudulent financial reporting is financial expertise possessed by the members of the audit committee, while the number of audit committee meetings has no effect on the fraudulent financial reporting. Limitation: This study only used a sample of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010-2018 and met the criteria. The dependent variable fraudulent financial reporting measured through the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score models. The independent variable was financial and or accounting expertise from the members of the audit committee and the Audit Committee Meeting. Contribution: Investors can consider this research in making decisions to be more careful in investing, as well as a reference for further research. The results of this study are expected to provide an overview and understanding of the role of the audit committee in suppressing fraudulent financial reporting using the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score. Keywords: Fraudulent financial reporting, Audit committee characteristics, Leverage

Purpose: This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the influence of financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audits, change in auditors, change of director and frequent number of CEO's picture in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Research methodology: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Results: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Limitations: This study used logistic regression analysis using a combined model of Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score that still contained an inaccurate classification of fraud and non-fraud. In the research, the R-Square value was low which meant that the ability of independent variables to influence the dependent variable was still low. Contribution: This research is expected to enrich the literature and references that can be used as a reference in other studies as well as in the company. The results of this study are expected to provide a deeper understanding of how to predict fraudulent financial reporting using the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score. Keywords: Fraudulent financial reporting, Fraud pentagon, Beneish M-Score, Altman Z-Score