Although a simple and useful pulmonary function test, spirometry remains underutilized in India. The Indian Chest Society and National College of Chest Physicians (India) jointly supported an expert group to provide recommendations for spirometry in India. Based on a scientific grading of available published evidence, as well as other international recommendations, we propose a consensus statement for planning, performing and interpreting spirometry in a systematic manner across all levels of healthcare in India. We stress the use of standard equipment, and the need for quality control, to optimize testing. Important technical requirements for patient selection, and proper conduct of the vital capacity maneuver, are outlined. A brief algorithm to interpret and report spirometric data using minimal and most important variables is presented. The use of statistically valid lower limits of normality during interpretation is emphasized, and a listing of Indian reference equations is provided for this purpose. Other important issues such as peak expiratory flow, bronchodilator reversibility testing, and technician training are also discussed. We hope that this document will improve use of spirometry in a standardized fashion across diverse settings in India.

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Pandemic of COVID-19 has brought a pletho-ra of challenges throughout the world and has opened exposed gaps in already overburdened stressful health system [...]

Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) patients sometimes have a persistent air leak (PAL) that leads to increased morbidity and increased hospital stay. Further, these patients also need pleurodesis to prevent a recurrence. Autologous blood patch pleurodesis (ABPP) has been successfully tried in post-lobectomy air leak cases. However, its utility in SSP patients with PAL has not been widely established. In this context, we performed a non-blinded randomized control study to compare the efficacy of ABPP vs doxycycline pleurodesis in the closure of air leak in SSP patients. This study was a non-blinded randomized control study done in 38 SSP patients with PAL. They were randomized into doxycycline arm and ABPP arm. Post pleurodesis air leak was assessed every 12 hours for cessation. Success was considered when there was a complete cessation of air leak. Post-procedural complications were noted and patients were followed up for 28 days to look for recurrence. The median time for closure was 24 hours [interquartile range (12.24)] for ABPP and 36 hours [interquartile range (24.72)] for doxycycline pleurodesis. Success rate of ABPP vs doxycycline pleurodesis is 94.7% vs 84.2% (p=0.6). Post-procedure pain was more in doxycycline group (15% vs 73%) (p<0.01). On visual analogue scale, ABPP had a lesser pain as compared to doxycycline pleurodesis (average visual analogue scale value of 2 vs scale of 7). The recurrence rate was equal in both groups (5%). Though ABPP and doxycycline have similar success rates, ABPP has an early closure of air leak and greater patient tolerability. ABPP can be tried as an alternative to doxycycline pleurodesis in SSP patients with persistent air leaks.

Patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during COVID-19 pandemic have higher morbidity. Treatment of these patients require aerosolization procedures like nebulization and noninvasive modalities for ventilation like non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Role of these procedures in corona virus transmission when treating a case of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should be further studied.