Findings suggest that assessing rehabilitation potential is a complex process that goes beyond strictly appraising patients' characteristics. Additional factors influence clinicians' perception of patients' rehabilitation potential. Clinicians should pay more attention to these factors when making evidence-based decisions regarding patients' potential to benefit from rehabilitation.

It has been shown that, in a bilateral force-matching task, subjects presenting weakness in one limb produce a lower force in the weakened limb even though they subjectively perceive that they are exerting the same force. The aim of this study was to verify whether subjects with hemiparesis produced asymmetrical forces during a bilateral submaximal grip task and whether this asymmetry is related to weakness of the paretic limb. Fifteen subjects with hemiparesis and 15 healthy subjects were recruited. First, the maximal voluntary force was measured for each hand. Then, subjects were asked to exert equal forces with both hands simultaneously at three submaximal force levels using two dynamometers. In the bilateral task, the force ratios (paretic/nonparetic or nondominant/dominant) differed between groups. Severely weak hemiparetic subjects produced lower force ratios than mildly weak hemiparetic subjects and healthy subjects (P < 0.000), whereas there was no difference between the force ratios produced by mildly weak hemiparetic subjects and those produced by healthy subjects. In subjects with hemiparesis, the force ratios in the bilateral task were related to the ratios of maximal voluntary forces (R2 = 0.39-0.66, P < or = 0.013) and the presence of somatosensory impairment did not affect these relationships. These results suggest that the strategy used is to compare the intensity of the motor commands on both sides and then perform the force-matching task. The use of such a strategy by subjects who have had paresis for 1 year reflects a lack of adaptation to their weakness.

OBJECTIVES. The use of cognitive strategies optimizes performance in complex everyday tasks such as shopping. This exploratory study examined the cognitive strategies people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) effectively use in an unstructured, real-world situation. METHOD. A behavioral analysis of the self-generated strategic behaviors of 5 people with severe TBI using videotaped sessions of an ecological shopping task (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile) was performed. RESULTS. All participants used some form of cognitive strategy in an unstructured real-world shopping task, although the number, type, and degree of effectiveness of the strategies in leading to goal attainment varied. The most independent person used the largest number and a broader repertoire of self-generated strategies. CONCLUSION. These results provide initial evidence that occupational therapists should examine the use of self-generated cognitive strategies in real-world contexts as a potential means of guiding therapy aimed at improving independence in everyday activities for people with TBI.